Re: [Harp-L] Re: Re: Hohner thunderbird
I don't think many harmonica players get harmonica economics. We already
have way more access to way more stuff than we should. It has traditional
taken near a century for something to endure a huge paradigm shift. We've
had access to a wealth of harmonica brands/models/keys/tunings for what, a
decade?
While we relatively Internet savvy players take the harp a bit more serious
than the rest - and often find ourselves using the Internet to create a
flat world for accessing harps and related info - we represent a small,
small, small, small fraction of harmonica sales relative to the whole of
the world.
Does the L represent even 1% of harmonica players?
On Friday, March 8, 2013 3:39:05 AM UTC-6, Steve Baker wrote:
>
> Dennis wrote:
> Perhaps, we should start a writing campaign to Mr. Suzuki. I am sure he
> is not oppose to making more money if he knows that there is a market out
> there for low tuned and minor key harmonicas.
>
> Steve comments:
> "Making more money" LOL? It's very hard for harmonica manufacturers "make
> money" at all on low tuned or minor key instruments. The quantities
> involved are far too small. On the contrary, manufacturing costs per unit
> with such small production runs are much higher. In addition, to make low
> tuned harps that don't rattle, it's necessary to modify the bottom cover.
> The conical lower cover on the Thunderbird took months to develop and
> required considerable investment in tools.
>
> Steve Baker
> www.stevebaker.de
> www.european-music-workshops.com
> www.harmonica-masters.de
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.