Re: [Harp-L] a business systems look at harmonica fastenings.
- To: karen mass <kdmass7@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] a business systems look at harmonica fastenings.
- From: Joseph Leone <3n037@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:24:57 -0500
- Cc: Harp L Harp L <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1360340698; bh=FbypBGPi+7w0LX5/8rwiYWvqQ+X3LA7TCciEtJNgPCI=; h=Received:Received:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=EXAVgO694wn0bYM1e4Ge5t80mw8zypfXjxXgXbFn48URpaPrq+nS+yI8Mq8W85ZvS j57cx9RZnVr+zChpYJUaq+dqWYuiFhMwiI5aU+GjyGGXLHm66OxKH8DlTPN4CzF0V3 3FTHQ8Cg6D573tJ9wA04mPQc4figfM5HRjVQWpQomH+fRL4H6NUHvi5t+T1YFhYpAK 3O3Y8yB2ztpmoFDbP04N9hdf30mfT4etj6ggyOQvk9kU+9oEKYQpFdRDzn2c87sZK/ 6obaQeKR5snhnfL2/URixyFWASK3tqN/mgOkbZEHNV63oBOVxw6hEzhxIhYhF7pjBW A4WR7faeyXDzQ==
- In-reply-to: <CAG33h7FGUpNJ7b6eQe81qTYM+GB3evZ6gf3mzX=c7-uwXL+f8w@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAG33h7FGUpNJ7b6eQe81qTYM+GB3evZ6gf3mzX=c7-uwXL+f8w@mail.gmail.com>
On Feb 8, 2013, at 5:03 AM, karen mass wrote:
> i think this is actually a pretty good analysis of a business decision.
> and it indicates a business model which i believe suzuki and other reed
> welders are pursuing.
>
> the other side of the analysis would be:
>
> a) the manufacturers haven't cut the prices on their harps in comparison to
> non-welding companies, at least not that i could find on the web. this
> means any cost saving due to the use of welding is passed directly on to
> the manufacturer, not the consumer.
>
> b) by welding reeds into place, they raise the price of changing a reed on
> a harmonica to the purchase price of a new harmonica instead of the price
> of a new reed. that's good business for the manufacturer, not so good for
> the consumer. of course, repair set tool costs would have to be factored
> in, but over time would probably be small.
>
> the only part of the analysis i would argue with is about the costs for the
> spot welding set up. the cost of set up for a spot welder is a
> non-recurring cost.
True, the 'second' barrel of welding would be $100.oo, then $10.oo, then ? It was only an analogy to show the gradually increasing costs of
going with more (shall we say) involved fastenings. :) Example? see part on machine screws with matching nuts.
smo-joe
> do it once, and you're done. after that the welding
> process station would fall under manufacturing maintenance. the only cost
> points then would be for periodic electrode replacement, electricity and
> occasional alignment. as i see it, spot welder station set up cost would
> be the same or less than for mechanical fastener station setups, and the
> cost of electricity, while higher for spot welders than for mechanical
> fastener stations, would certainly not even approach the higher costs of
> fastener station maintenance. in a harmonica construction context, very
> small weld spots combined with an extremely easy to weld (i.e., low
> temperature weld) material such as brass or steel would make for a very low
> cost weld.
>
> iowaplayer
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.