[Harp-L] re: Draw 2 vs Blow 3 (diatonic)
- To: "harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx" <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Harp-L] re: Draw 2 vs Blow 3 (diatonic)
- From: martin oldsberg <martinoldsberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 06:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1377266305; bh=IXx7aEDF20dwSAPIObANdixsGLGsf+2SEj6jD8lleDc=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hi1o6ZHMlnn3or8a6dgDO4xq6oF9r17IDDs1e61QxhqzHpZnD+wPT7cjwZfqy3DDjlIv/7OeaFssyeye3+85ph4LO9q7zYZQrxz033QXH252MZMR8rqdI9d9BdRQs9bRGYmUjEImDmKp1sZZGD+Ar5jkG0quYI55nUE/3HbCnGQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=5meyPSgaFoOpro7HJ1rU8sPxO/tgeF7H+fI3K+VpUZb6iT9t1/nNTr/6HXQesWnHRo5hZzdjEngSgCVAhzhy+9rxnZfsVDOxUwAGqRtTSnLKypew1ODGVXtHDK7zN4+ihKbE3DyA93hFOxhLUeSqIICDkRS/1pilSYpNBzeAryw=;
- Reply-to: martin oldsberg <martinoldsberg@xxxxxxxxx>
The only way on the harmonica to fake that famous Chuck Berry guitar riff where he bends the G string up and plays the same note (or an interval) on the B string is through holes 2D-3B.(It´s on "Johnny B Goode" for example; and I know: he stole it from T-bone Walker.)
It ain´t working like it should, but as I said, "fake".
/Martin
>For 2P playing, Draw 2 is more effective than Blow 3 (same note) because it:
>
> 1. connects fluidly to adjacent notes while still in the Draw
> 2. offers bend variations
> 3. has a slightly different tone and response
>
>I require that beginning students NOT default to Blow 3.
>
>OF COURSE there are exceptions. But I'm interested to hear how much mileage
>and versatility you get from favoring Draw 2 in most 2P blues playing.
>
>What's your input here?
>Robert Hale
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.