Re: [Harp-L] Re: SPAH award criteria

[The Iceman <icemanle@xxxxxxx>]

>From where I sit, I have not seen any sabotaging of the convention, so this comment is curious.


This type of topic seems to be very timely.


There are a small percentage of the world's population that see Edward Snowden as a disgruntled employee and a traitor, while the larger percentage see him as an insider with important information to disseminate to all concerned - a whistleblower.


Being an insider, I've disseminated information that I believe is important to the harmonica public. Some of it has not been well received over the years, but it has been the truth.


I've been promoting this year's SPAH - Michel Herblin's performance being worth the price of admission alone.


The films being shown is another master stroke to make the convention worthwhile.


Winslow is doing a great job....people within the organization with personal agendas and bad mojo are leaving and the hope is that others with a better vision take their place.


I only hope SPAH can get back on track with membership..at one time, the vibes were good and membership levels were reaching near 1300. Something changed and members "voted" by dropping out of SPAH. These are the important numbers that tell the tale, regardless of personal opinions.


Looking forward to a growing and better SPAH in the future.



-----Original Message-----
From: bobbie-g <bobbie-g@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: harp-l <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thu, Aug 8, 2013 10:32 pm
Subject: [Harp-L] Re: SPAH award criteria



Lastly, former or disgruntled members of SPAH should get a life and quit 
trying to sabotage the convention every single year since abandoning 
SPAH. Yawn.

 bg