Re: [Harp-L] SPAH awards criteria
It ain't ovah til da fat lady plays da bloooze. # /o
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Hunter" <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] SPAH awards criteria
Bob Hallway wrote:
<Methinks Richard wants to see if he got nominated, and wants everyone
else
<to see if he got nominated.
I suppose it's natural to question my motivation, and of course it's
easier than asking whether the questions I posed have merit.
I expected personal attacks when I raised this issue, and I'm not
surprised to see this one; I will in fact be surprised if there aren't
more.
I'm going to avoid discussion of my motivations, since 1) it's
pointless--many people will believe whatever they choose to believe,
whether or not protestations to the contrary are offered, and 2) it's not
the issue that matters.
I've discussed my point of view at length, SPAH has said they'll consider
it post-conference--a choice I don't agree with, but their choice to
make--and as far as I'm concerned the discussion is over for now.
Thanks, Richard Hunter
author, "Jazz Harp"
latest mp3s and harmonica blog at http://hunterharp.com
Myspace http://myspace.com/richardhunterharp
Vids at http://www.youtube.com/user/lightninrick
more mp3s at http://taxi.com/rhunter
Twitter: lightninrick
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.