Re: [Harp-L] Technique u blocking
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Technique u blocking
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:01:15 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=iJpa2vcHc5skLh0tCv27XAQO0XLZT/vqJUiVt/nNcBJUKxCU2xfBAppSTWs7tWnt; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MARK BURNESS wrote:
<Can anyone point me to the commandment, written in stone, that dictates that anyone who switches embouchure to achieve a certain <technique will be smote by a thunderbolt from above? Turned to a pillar of salt perhaps?
<
<Very, very few players adhere to one single embouchure for everything they do (they do exist & may even be high profile, but are <statistically a very small group), most players switch embouchures in normal playing & certainly to facilitate certain <effects...it's legal, honest! ;-)
All true. That said, I fail to see what can be done with a u-block that can't be done--and probably more easily--with a pucker or a tongue block.
I know and love Norton Buffalo's work, but he is one of the very few u-blockers whose work I admire, compared to an army of puckerers (Toots, Stevie, Musselwhite...) and tongue blockers (need I name names?). I think the reasons are this: it's easier for most people to do it with a pucker or a block, and the constraints that u-blocking puts on a player don't exist with those other techniques.
To me, achieving equivalent performance with less effort = better.
Regards, Richard Hunter
author, "Jazz Harp"
latest mp3s and harmonica blog at http://hunterharp.com
Myspace http://myspace.com/richardhunterharp
Vids at http://www.youtube.com/user/lightninrick
more mp3s at http://taxi.com/rhunter
Twitter: lightninrick
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.