Re: [Harp-L] dylan et al.
- To: JON KIP <jonkip@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] dylan et al.
- From: Michael Rubin <michaelrubinharmonica@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:31:57 -0500
- Cc: harp-l <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0aqr96aqm2pCFgb6aMNrFm+D0xeCiHrdl8/q7Vz+jn4=; b=v/iy1kJYTW9XUqC76npgvyta26rTOv0SzPdGQ7AhsFJDXsqhYIdLiJfATngUup9X3m YPW98oI9kgQ3TGP0jHre5fsT32VpiMVJptDHyVGettqSdt9x43xjq0A0eJrmC2yYPSrM rtoMLgjB1C/gLTabLvmdbOwL9GbRuD4nuU7DrzmL7YctTKetmrI+HZYovKX6pMJzQlUN HeXBRxK9QC1h6q36MY2ZM28hHjnTU/BWTdyYh9c7EtbtKzdmwsUI5T7E5SnHhWg8BtaB MmUkMgFqBnJRhcGG9PuDms4cmWk3r47qsm3Pjl14y5JlgNvYgSaMYKBh0ubMIoVFPf3P ZlLg==
- In-reply-to: <DF6F71D1-A5DF-4D4C-B8A7-4D330C0968D5@earthlink.net>
- References: <201304051332.r35DWcIb030353@harp-l.com> <DF6F71D1-A5DF-4D4C-B8A7-4D330C0968D5@earthlink.net>
Good rebuttal John. I see both sides at different times.
Michael Rubin
Michaelrubinharmonica.com
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 1:08 PM, JON KIP <jonkip@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Bob,
> > I don't agree with you. Touching people is about commercialism. Art is
> > about self expression. On the receiving end, art succeeds when the
> > receiver cannot continue his life in the same way after experiencing said
> > art. But that is not the purpose of art. The artist should not care
> about
> > the result of his work, only that he is an artist, therefore he creates
> art.
> > Michael Rubin
> > Michaelrubinharmonica
>
>
> a very sweeping re-defining of some common words.
>
> Touching people is about commercialism?
>
> in my reality, touching people is just about creating an effect. Good,
> Bad, or indifferent.
>
> > But that is not the purpose of art.
>
> who says it can't be one of the purposes of art?
>
> not I.
>
> "Success" to the artist, means that he/she has done what he/she set out to
> do... whatever it is
>
> "Commercial Success" pays better, and is not, in and of itself, a bad
> thing. (Can't eat 'success')
>
> > The artist should not care about
> > the result of his work
> who says?
>
> still not I
>
> Art for art's sake is kind of like masturbation (so I've heard)
> Art as Communication is kind of like The Real Thing (again, so I've heard)
>
> I suppose each has its place.....
>
> which reminds me.........
>
> time to go "do art"
>
> jk, musical artist who finds enjoyment in his music and who enjoys (and
> who is amazed) when others seem to enjoy his silly attempts at music.
>
> http://jonkip.com
>
>
> On Apr 5, 2013, at 6:32 AM, harp-l-request@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Bob,
> > I don't agree with you. Touching people is about commercialism. Art is
> > about self expression. On the receiving end, art succeeds when the
> > receiver cannot continue his life in the same way after experiencing said
> > art. But that is not the purpose of art. The artist should not care
> about
> > the result of his work, only that he is an artist, therefore he creates
> art.
> > Michael Rubin
> > Michaelrubinharmonica
>
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.