Re: [Harp-L] Re: Terminology: overblow, overdraw, overbend, blow-bend - Now u...
- To: robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Re: Terminology: overblow, overdraw, overbend, blow-bend - Now u...
- From: BluzeHarp@xxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 19:58:18 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1364947098; bh=wmv/rAnnQ1HFEvii1Hw4eauZGXRedhHLXdGkl7RrJPU=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ck20XC+3Ale2hzDXxl/aTP/3P2SzqJt6zfUl9W2BzVtvqqTfkaj6FpKqxmQw050uL 3FEdOZN0LcZ4jp9Epy+9neU9tnNJM5fiweRFhXFGEvv+f++zRELlYHYsAVeXlb93gg pC4QZk0Fiojzzzk4ap+mxDa0mzGtaimJ1kew3GOQ=
I feel ya Robert. I can only say it's definitive that I usually WEAR
briefs... but even those probably aren't the 'briefest'. Beyond that nothing
much is certain.
I liked Winslow's reply as well. It was more technical than my own, and
gave something of the 'why & how' of a technique that I think would more
sensibly be called an 'upbend'.
In a message dated 4/2/2013 5:28:01 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
Hi Christopher, (Your chin is lookin' good)
And now I realize how redundant "definitive definitions" is! What WAS I
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:25 PM, <_BluzeHarp@xxxxxxxx
(mailto:BluzeHarp@xxxxxxx) > wrote:
Robert Hale writes:
Can anyone link me to the briefest, definitive definitions?
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and