Re: Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Update on Harrison Harps
- To: jevern@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Update on Harrison Harps
- From: EGS1217@xxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 07:11:25 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1347966685; bh=YSpg10FF9SZIwQry4BS/YQGnMcWGAOO24HZ0APIwLBk=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NoWTL6Z4jEs9bgCtjAcMpCKjIQXrf+R5OfLHBiFwP8k8uuGfHKfi4CcF1FcKXDb2D WfcSGV4sd4QN3eW9oMNf65OxGBVDBSM0IfNSq5tv8GNin3Z6vAmQwtgjmp2yUyLpZ1 DBEN8tj6L7XtrU91PuTvNjlqonBMdKyc2GhieqLw=
Vern writes:
"It is quite common to start with serial numbers greater than one to
obscure the total number sold. My guess here would be the number 1500!"
That's an interesting theory but doesn't fit in this case since my C (which
came in a few months earlier) is numbered in the 900+ range.
Elizabeth
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.