I have been enjoying this conversation that has been sparked by comments about the SUB-30. It has gone off in some interesting tangents. It really feels like there are a bunch of guys sitting around, perhaps sipping on their favorite adult beverage, and having an open and honest discussion about what is important to them. So many great points have been made and I would like to add my commentary to some of the things said by a variety of people.
In the interest of full disclosure I think it is important for you to understand where I am coming from because my comments will certainly be influenced by my perspective as an after-market harmonica parts guy. I have been playing the harmonica for right at 40 years so I have witnessed first-hand the escalating prices of harmonicas over the years. I have also been in the after-market business since January 2011 so I have torn apart and reassembled more harps than the average guy. At this particular moment in time I have over 500 combs in stock, about 200 sets of powder coated cover plates and easily 200 harmonicas. This is not meant to be an advertisement. I'm just sayin..
Let me start by pointing out that the people who read and post on harp-l and other harmonica centric forums are a different class of people. Not better or worse - just different. My guess is that the average harp-l contributor is far more knowledgeable about and been playing the harmonica far longer than the average harmonica player. Brendan stated that "The diatonic harmonica is the biggest selling instrument in the world - in terms of units sold." On some of the old Marine Band boxes Hohner printed words to the effect of, "Hohner employs 6,000 workers and produces 20 million harmonicas a year." Twenty Million a year for the past 100+ years! That's a lot of harmonicas and a lot of harmonica players. How many subscribers does harp-l have - 200, 500, 1,000? Whatever the number, it is a very small percentage of the harmonica playing population. Most of the stuff we obsess about never even enters the mind of the "average" harmonica player. Does that mean this stuff is not important? No. Of course it's important. After all, SPAH is the Society for the Preservation and ADVANCEMENT(!) of the Harmonica. We're the ones who want to see progress! But let's understand that as far as the harmonica is concerned, we have much higher standards than most.
Ken Deifik asked, "Does anybody like the Suzuki UltraBend out of the box?" I do. It plays as well out of the box as any other good harmonica. Could it be made to play better with some "customization"? Of course - but name one harmonica that can't be similarly described. The last guy who tried to build an "Out of the Box harmonica that was as good as a Custom" famously went down in flames. I'm not saying it can't be done, but so far nobody has built a successful company that could make this claim.
Look at it this way. Take what most would describe as an "Intermediate" player. They are proficient at draw bends on the bass end of the harp and blow beds on the treble end. They can't over-blow. They can't do single reed valved bends on a valved harp. Hand them a SUB-30 and, without any improvement in technique or skills and you've just added 6-8 notes to their repertoire. Out of the box! Give the average guy a choice between buying a $65 Crossover or Session Steel and tell them that it will be six months to a year before they can use over-blows or valved bends musically, or they can spend $200 and be able to play the same notes TODAY and I suggest to you that many will fork over the $200. So yeah, out of the box it is a pretty damn good harp.
What about the price of harps and custom harps? Harps, like everything else, are getting more expensive. Does it really cost Suzuki that much to make a SUB-30 that than say a Manji? I dunno. I have no idea how Suzuki determined the price. But if the 30 reed diatonic is indeed the harmonica of the future and given that the patent has expired and anybody can build them, how long will it be before others enter the market. Supply and demand. Maybe competition will help drive prices down. Maybe not. We'll see. I'll tell you what I find ironic though is that interspersed among all this talk about paying $200 for a SUB-30, we've got Mike Fugazzi advertising a custom Golden Melody for $250. No offense to Mike. I'm sure his custom harp is worth every penny. A Golden Melody is a $35 harmonica that has been turned into a custom harp with an asking price of $250.
So let's talk about customizing harps.
Matt Smart has made a number of excellent points in his posts recently. He brings a lot of experience to the table and makes a lot of sense. Matt posted a comment recently on Facebook urging customizers to teach their customers some basic skills, such as gapping. I couldn't agree more. Matt and I are both very comb centric because we are both in the business but here's my take on the subject. If you take the average harmonica, flat sand the comb (or replace it with a quality custom comb) and flat sand the draw plate to eliminate leaks, then adjust the gaps - nothing more than that - you will have a harmonica that will meet the needs of 95% of the harmonica playing population. A perfect example of this, by the way, is a direct response to the question posted by Michael Montgomery about the Big River. In the beginning of the summer I picked up 30 new Big Rivers at a very good price. I offered them on my website with your choice of any custom comb for $35.00. All I did was flat sand the draw plate, replace the comb, check for leaks and ship them out. No gapping. Just like they came from the factory with a better comb and flat sanded reed plates. The feedback has been 100% positive. They all turned out to be nice playing harps. Are they over-blow monsters? No, but I don't think that's what my customers were looking for. These simple steps are something that anybody can do. Reed work is another story all together. With the exception of the Marine Band which is still assembled with nails most harps nowadays can be taken apart with a screwdriver and made into better playing harp very easily. Doesn't it make sense to acquire some of those minimal skills? If more people did you would hear a lot less comments like, "I played the XXXX-Harp 20 years ago and it was a piece of junk" (therefore all XXXX-Harps are junk). It is entirely possible that all that piece of junk needs was to adjust the gaps on the reeds and it would have been a perfectly good harp. Not every out of the box is a winner and neither are they all lemons. But it my firm belief that, unless you are talking about $10 Chinese toy harp, the vast majority of harps from the major manufacturers, Hohner, Suzuki, Seydel and Lee Oskar can be made to be good playing harps with a little bit of TLC.
My friend Harvey Berman in New Orleans, a wonderful gentleman and a very fine customizer, created a thread on MBH asking if you really needed a custom harp. Here's the link:
http://www.modernbluesharmonica.com/board/board_topic/5560960/1568722.htm
If you watch Dave Barret's interview with Joe Spiers, you will come away with the same impression.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ie7tsb28Ywk
Most people really don't need full blown custom harps. I do not believe that customizers are guilty of overselling but I do believe that many people buy custom harps because they think it will magically make them better players. I hope these are not the same guys who are complaining about $200 for SUB-30. Wouldn't that be ironic?
I know this post has run on kinda long. Sorry about that. I've been following the conversation for a few days and just haven't had time to inject my thoughts until now.
Tom Halchak www.BlueMoonHarmonicas.com
Clearwater, FL
======= Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 9.0.0.2308, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.20600) http://www.pctools.com/ =======