Re: Subject: [Harp-L] Disclaimers
- To: "EGS1217@xxxxxxx" <EGS1217@xxxxxxx>, "harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx" <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Subject: [Harp-L] Disclaimers
- From: mik jagger <harpomatic@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc:
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1347592660; bh=klk2Lmz4ekbM9D9/DGow/H1HEJ1rhcIgo/gQogiiWYQ=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=2S0IRaBwpy9yBIwj4Hqefj1bPEib4f2x3YOyPdegayJpuHTTY1rMV7oET5TxtCuCz0FqXo9nas3UQkgODXhtK9nif2iTrtgWVu6IuHWdtke1IU6WwUvTwarO8PuTOXPjr61+d7c3jCDy1k5a/W7sP1m90lJZxSsyJBlnc0wRNec=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=0tC3vdUNby/HvoPC1SGnitZ4fZ6kEsLUqN+EfZIRJ+K2qI1lwrujtc8DkYS4df40LdqXyE3gZD2jskjsg9Cf8w8WIfJnX6YPYcM2AcHsocZJFGFr9eLVnoJkkwfRzHh53AQbYAS/YKw7bRyctFGQ02MuvP4tdpuZK+HlmSJssWI=;
- In-reply-to: <215f3.49a54edc.3d83f8eb@aol.com>
- References: <215f3.49a54edc.3d83f8eb@aol.com>
- Reply-to: mik jagger <harpomatic@xxxxxxxxx>
Elizabeth, your last two posts have no harmonica content, and as such only provoke 'meta" discussion - sorry moderator, I fell in that meta trap - see even good men "slip" on occassion :)
________________________________
From: "EGS1217@xxxxxxx" <EGS1217@xxxxxxx>
To: harpomatic@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: Subject: [Harp-L] Disclaimers
Just for the record 'mik', I don't yet play blues harp and never have
claimed that I did. I play chromatics. Perhaps you're mixing me up with another
Elizabeth? However, one doesn't need to actually play blues in order to own
diatonics (I do), or know what good diatonic playing is all about (I do know
quite a bit about that too since I count several brilliant players among
my closest friends).
As to 'redundant posts on bending draw 2' --this IS a harmonica list and
that IS a topic for conversation here, redundant or not--given that new people
join the list all the time. So it just might not be 'redundant' for them, no?
It's certainly not a site for your personal diatribes about
anything which crosses your mind since whatever falls outside of harmonicas is
basically off-topic as the listowner has made clear time and again. That's what
the meta list is for or haven't you been paying any attention at all?
In my case I'm not remotely PC but since you do so enjoy name-calling,
trying to explain anything further to you would be akin to having a
conversation with a 4 yr old in the middle of throwing a temper tantrum.
Speaking of spoiled brats--I'll let your post speak for itself.
Elizabeth
In a message dated 9/13/2012 10:27:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
harpomatic@xxxxxxxxx writes:
I tell you more - if i cannot talk freely here, moderator may as well shut me down, i don't care then at all. I'll just read the digest, what's the difference? Your "PC" attitude is the reason why there are same 15 people out of 1000+ members that inundate harpl with redundant posts on bending hole #2 or similar. The rest just does not want to bother responding to people like you. Further, I think pampered touchy-feely, "$300.00" a harp spoiled brat softies that cannot handle any real, let alone critical discussion have no business discussing the "future of BLUES harp" - you know nothing about blues to begin with, there are countless thousands of real players that will run circles around you, while playing the $1 Johnson harp, made in China, thank God that "LAND" is there, surely supplying the untold "less fortunate" masses...
>
>
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.