Re: [Harp-L] harmonicas are not guitars
- To: jross38@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] harmonicas are not guitars
- From: MundHarp@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:42:32 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1351485753; bh=cg40qvO126mMyTqpP9oizh+l+orOL6DV5xKI6eDrkbo=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Q8x3GZQgkTz81Xqa2Ub81QrjsLxmswBERK0DsMN5HWJ+2D4kTDiWIQgGiChozoGj5 ylp1ZXRwN7mSrrQLXzXL9paSPCufQ8WwsR7tzahszoNrmNebRBOWlxwTfByIp5RY3B MZiPjdKNi2KdAMta5UkbJXNyVWYAz01swir98VHk=
Yes but the comb of the harmonica is NOT a "Sound Board". It has NOTHING to
do with the vibrations of the sound!
It is INERT. (mostly!)
John "Whiteboy" Walden
Just now in:
bonnie Scotland.
In a message dated 10/28/2012 9:44:20 P.M. GMT Standard Time,
jross38@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> Of course not but I still think its a decent example as the reeds and
strings are in close proximity to the body
It's a horrible example because the way the two work is entirely
different. In a guitar you pluck the strings which then translate their vibration
through the bridge to the thin membrane which is the top of the guitar. The
vibrations of the top set the chamber of air inside the body into motion
and this is what you hear: the amplified string. In the harmonica you
create a large column of air moving through the gate of the reed. It is the
chopping of this column of air which you hear, not the vibration of the reed
per se. Totally different means of production. The similar proximity of
the reed and the strings to the parts of the instrument is irrelevant.
> I'm not a guitar player but I do not know any good guitar player that
plays a plastic body guitar correct me if I'm wrong. If they do it's a much
harder, denser acrylic blend vs that abs cheap light stuff that will melt
with light heat. Example Seydel makes a more dense plastic comb on the
silver that is much better and dishwasher safe
If you watched the second video from the start you would have read that it
did indeed warp/melt in moderate heat (a car window). ABS is inexpensive,
but not cheap--it does the job quite well which is why so many harmonica
companies use it. Is your argument against it one of feel--ie, it feels
cheap? Or is it the lightness? What makes ABS a bad material specifically?
What makes other plastics better? Do you object to all injection molded
combs? Just trying to get a more clear answer than the amorphous "cheap".
> But if that doesn't satisfy you then pick a nice flute or other woodwind
instrument. Do they use cheap plastic? No
Woodwinds are more similar to harmonicas than are guitars, but different
enough that the materials don't directly equate. That said, there is much
debate about what if any effect material has on the performance of
woodwinds. In my not limited experience with flue pipes the main factors which
influence tone and timbre are ones of construction, rigidity, and density. The
specific material is mostly important in terms of how it dictates those
factors. But, harmonicas don't have their pitch or timbre determined by the
resonant body to which they are connected, and so their behavior is
different. (well, the reason everyone sounds a bit different is because our
lungs, throat and mouth are the resonant chamber of the harmonica--but while
each player sounds a bit different, we all sound like harmonica players, IMO)
> I would also submit that most harmonica customizers do not use stock
combs unless fixing up the marine band stock or using the stock sp20 comb. I
don't think they do this just because they look good. I can speak with
decent authority here because I sell parts to many of them
And I reject this as being an argument by authority. I'm sure there are
many reasons why people would choose your combs. The flatness one is pretty
compelling, IMO. A nice feel or look is quite important as well. But
this doesn't address any of the questions I raised or points I made.
Dave Payne writes:
"I was all agreeing with you about how the comb doesn't do tuning fork
stuff, doesn't resonate like a tuning fork, etc. until you said this:
"The harmonica comb is essentially inert.
So take a wooden table. Find an even larger table to bang it on. You will
notice no tuning-fork resonant action.
However, have somebody gently rap one end of the table and put your ear on
the other end."
Now take two large pieces of brass which weigh proportionally as much to
the table as reed-plates to a harmonica comb. Screw them securely together
with the table in between. Repeat the process rapping on the wood. You
will be unable to set the table into vibration and thus translate nothing.
Again, compare like to like, not like to unlike.
JR Ross
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.