Re: [Harp-L] XB-40
- To: linvillec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] XB-40
- From: MundHarp@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 11:10:13 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1337353814; bh=JiBtqqzcMk5DGmmLikSug+1uWeMA2gbnYlOHeYU+Yx4=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vkfuWHYhWp26r8O+RNyeSkYrSvZam3sJFK7ngdKvm9eq08yX8lT/IEBpz3WOzOy8y 43/WdaFzAM8Z6aIAABjrJnbo5WYDJb5I+QzGl5jxlpQc+mjpmXl5PvgOrLgyHKpuKZ O4jViuZ3vR9zN7B9xVGdRZUJefkcRU+rezNdB0bg=
I don't like them...
They are a bit like a "swanee whistle". Hard to control accurately.
But other folk's "mileage might vary".
Different strokes for different folks.
John "Whiteboy" Walden
Just now in Scotland.
_http://johnwalden.freevar.com_ (http://johnwalden.freevar.com)
In a message dated 5/18/2012 3:05:54 P.M. GMT Daylight Time,
linvillec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
<<It's like it's almost TOO easy to bend, at least for me and my ability
at this time. So I'm just wondering if there is a general consensus on these
instruments.>>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.