Re: [Harp-L] u-blocking comparison
- To: Robert Coble <robertpcoble@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] u-blocking comparison
- From: Robert Hale <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:05:03 -0700
- Cc: Harp-L <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=acGKQH0AMHx5cDtMlQufmeyJfuEybWoewo06ThDCt6Y=; b=sc+m5RXgdULO2ykwVhtPWxe9YseyBvUoUVwSdDL3BvuDiDEmnh4q+JoPcdxjOWn4ER pH0ap65viTXsPG8arTB90VuAF8dC4eAbgLdPlWs+NYd+ZO29RdmvbPPioSQ7u9gq113k Jg0oDv/wMUpe1e7wvhpQAl5KBjdwLBBJDwZdqwXmXUo7w913UICjB4QPrSpeHdqTwEfL AmUvFJGUq4SMV+1mVPxp/gbtCpQctgtImrqzrFActM0y9w0vuruZDwkb7FOnSeJfyDKV hy/nvviytLTugheDCFJE01MmWn+dfSXcqQFEi/HOBNW5iDahzwAoSt2+xCxeI3gXLrvv 5/og==
- In-reply-to: <SNT121-W3417E6B428B67C0122517AC4580@phx.gbl>
- References: <SNT121-W3417E6B428B67C0122517AC4580@phx.gbl>
- Sender: ynfdwas@xxxxxxxxx
My initial question didn't invite comparison or ranking of the 3 methods. I
haven't spotted any replies that claimed to prioritize them, either. I'm
happy to read your article suggested.
What may be old hat to some, is still new to others. What's a shibboleth?
Robert Hale
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Robert Coble <robertpcoble@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> Do we still have the "shibboleth" regarding the genetic (in)capability to
> U-block?
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.