Re: [Harp-L] MB 364 and 365 modifications
- To: "burket@xxxxxxx" <burket@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] MB 364 and 365 modifications
- From: Larry Sandy <slyou65@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:30:32 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: harp-l <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1330655432; bh=SWc4srbH0LStR6XRtykim1R32iQXGbLzEFtRU79xVa8=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=euJwqa1egeZMQ+w8By41Otjr6WSPxvgzBaRxt3yMvqHjFYYy2yqp4OWRfbVdXNmXWIfWQ857ddb3Thac/O8EP9dNVRxqMSLtRYYAGrQYhQT4Tj1DPb77yA3YgF4SwvC1SQgk/+c4jgj3dykSuXiSBJuLU6xhFMe+Y3KWIYRmPLk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Q3us94gNN2OlqRPmLWx4M0cM0ZebRplzTmYnMfK9G6vUvkTzamjOvCwdUjtuwirzF8DDPehO5rIjHWd2EoEdtKUIUzlSPwv9CBnvQgQv4THlyYCRmYblyiusNK7pdg4vtkqmtcYdktxIWSeDIkPDNnAm6zMVuJPEHMu8i3Nx7FU=;
- In-reply-to: <8CEC607E82B794C-76C-13714@webmail-d094.sysops.aol.com>
- References: <201203011147.q21BkqIc001241@harp-l.com> <8CEC607E82B794C-76C-13714@webmail-d094.sysops.aol.com>
- Reply-to: Larry Sandy <slyou65@xxxxxxxxx>
Sir BurkeT,
The 364 D does start on a low D, just as the C does. The newer 364's ( and possibly the 365's) are no longer made in Germany and to my ears have a slightly different timbre, which I like. Their entire history isn't clear to me but they've been around for several generations.
I visually compared some 364's to 365's and realized they are the same thickness and height but the 364 has a very slightly flatter area where the lips contact them. The 365 arches more in that area. That surprised me because I agreed with other players in describing the 364 as "fatter".
I have flattened some 364's covers but it didn't seem to improve the sound much, if at all. I did change the sound of one harp by applying rubber tape to the inside of the covers. The sound may have sounded the same to observers but the vibrations I felt were subdued. I considered attaching thicker tape to "muffle" it more.
Have you half- valved any yet? I don't particularly care for the performance of half valving, even my Pro Masters, but there are occasional uses for them. I make mine out of a thin strip of teflon oven liner ( don't tell Sandy where her big sheet went). I also have several commercial windsavers in my larder.
I have several ideas to try and find the experimenting very rewarding. But that's just me.
Now, I'm going to start a fresh pot of Joe. Then spend the evening.....
Breathing Music to-daily
Lockjaw "anxious for Virginia Harmonicafest 12" Larry
________________________________
From: "burket@xxxxxxx" <burket@xxxxxxx>
To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2012 4:17 PM
Subject: [Harp-L] MB 364 and 365 modifications
(Thread renamed)- (was) Re: [Harp-L] solo vocal and 14 hole marine band in C
-------------
Thanks Larry:
I appreciate the feedback and tips. More things to try out! I look forward to trying new methods to make these harps more responsive. The low C is really nice and growley, and the upper scale notes nice to have. I assume the D 364 model is a low D and does not start the scale where a standard Marine Band in D would and goes up from there (Like the G does) ?
In comparing a C 364 to a 365 yesterday, I found the immediate reaction to be that the 364 sounded a bit tighter and more responsive OoTB, but maybe that's the extra length of the 365. The 365 cover plates feel better on my lips though.
This is a great road map and I'm sure it can't take you very long before you are rewarded with
a fresh cup of joe :)
Keep me posted on your adventures in taking a C down to a low A.
Regards-
Burke T.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.