Re:[Harp-L] Low and High Pass Filter to fight feeback?
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re:[Harp-L] Low and High Pass Filter to fight feeback?
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 12:18:00 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=ePfda18BzKtYPpWOLwEC1XnbfDKTHhDRRzu9FZ316yuXfHRmzmhDn27o+qc+AsMz; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mike Fugazzi wrote:
<Anyone ever use these? If so, at what frequencies? I am assuming a
<decent amount of bass and high end feedback rings at frequencies that
<actually don't matter to the sound of the harmonica. In otherwords,
<when played, the harmonica doesn't even reach that low or high of a
<sound.
"Filter" is another name for "EQ." A low pass filter cuts out frequencies ABOVE a certain point (thus allowing low frequencies to "pass" through), a high pass filter cuts out frequencies BELOW a certain point.
Harmonica puts out a LOT of energy in the frequencies from 8 kHz and up, and it's usually useful to cut those frequencies back with whatever EQ you've got in order to reduce high-frequency content that will make the audience's ears bleed, even if the mic isn't feeding back. (I have killed a lot of small animals in my time with high notes that were well below the feedback threshhold.) But if you're using a bullet mic and a tube amp, you don't need to worry about it, because a bullet mic and tube amp combo produces a very steep dropoff in energy after 6 kHz.
Below 100 hZ, most harmonicas are putting out breathing noise and not much else. However, cutting EQ at 100 hZ on a typical mixer may also reduce surrounding frequencies in the 200-250 hZ range that contribute a lot to the tone of an amped harp.
Another poster wrote that he gets feedback issues mostly at 800 hZ, and that makes sense to me. When I check the tones I get from my Digitech amp modelers on a frequency analyzer, I see a LOT of energy in the 600-1000 hZ range. It's easier to deal with that kind of thing with a graphic EQ, as opposed to a high or low pass filter. I suppose you could use a band pass filter (an EQ that reduces frequencies on either side of a specific range), but why bother? You'll sound like you're playing through a telephone, which is cool sometimes but far from always, and most feedback tends to originate in very specific, relatively narrow frequency bands, which is exactly the problem that a graphic EQ addresses.
Regards, Richard Hunter
author, "Jazz Harp"
latest mp3s and harmonica blog at http://hunterharp.com
Myspace http://myspace.com/richardhunterharp
Vids at http://www.youtube.com/user/lightninrick
more mp3s at http://taxi.com/rhunter
Twitter: lightninrick
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.