[Harp-L] Re: Harp-L not part of "all things harmonica?"
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx, harp-l-meta-discussions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: Harp-L not part of "all things harmonica?"
- From: Michelle LeFree <mlefree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:13:03 -0600
- Cc:
- In-reply-to: <CAG6QO3j3BkUsy5cZ+-8F-esNT_7er-mmi6Eg7BAopxh2s8EorA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <502B9531.6050507@gmail.com><6c2aaacf-62da-441c-a745-7ac36bb827ea@v9g2000pbu.googlegroups.com> <CAG6QO3j3BkUsy5cZ+-8F-esNT_7er-mmi6Eg7BAopxh2s8EorA@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
Hello all, and fjm in particular-
I just want to openly offer the opinion that Harp-L */does /*indeed
belong to the set of of "all things harmonica." It is certainly a
significant part of */my /*harmonica world and I know I'm not the only
one. I for one applaud William for making his plaintive and generous
post on Harp-L!
fjm, your iron-clad insistence that discussion of the groups demise is
not permitted on-list severely restricts that discussion as only a
handful of members have complied with your condition of joining the meta
discussion group (to which I also sent this message). It is my opinion
that such a severe restriction, especially now that the group is truly
on the "precipice" will help assure a negative end result. I find this
confounding. Are you actually willing to have the ship go down by
insisting on this ideologically-rooted framework to the bitter end?
After your long and storied history of singular extraordinary efforts to
keep Harp-L alive, it seems to me contradictory for you to take that
hard of a line at the time when the group is already "shipping water."
Another thing. I think I understand the basis for your long-stated
opinion that a forum platform is not the way to go. However, having the
groups only real leader for the last decade and more taking that
position to the exclusion of other solutions that may help save the
group is similarly confusing to me. What difference does it make what
the platform is as long as the group survives?
fjm, I feel that if you cannot change your apparent course of
obstructing the group's ability to save itself, you should step away
from your role as the group's philosophical leader and let the
membership try to save itself with whatever means it can, including
discussing the group's very fate on-list.
So there. I've said it. Please know, fjm, that what I've said here in no
way diminishes the magnitude of my appreciation for all you have done
for Harp-L over the years. I'm just asking you to do this one last thing
for it.
Gratefully and Respectfully,
Michelle
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.