Re: [Harp-L] RE: Distorted harmonica Versus Clean Harmonica

To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] RE: Distorted harmonica Versus Clean Harmonica
From: The Iceman <icemanle@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 17:11:55 -0400 (EDT)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1344460315; bh=BZguHWR0gQUp9xc6AMvPmEwb5bd8N437lCYxqOFVswc=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gZYysZ+vJAswvSDGvcYoaQMnVBodTjNqO4cXmMdSjDkhz5xTgg0vcVvde9J5vEP/A sYiQTqo+4cqaP8fq22Z5/9n5ahO7IhjCQY+PnVBsVee9ME5U4716ecitQpid/GOu7a 0Gip9wmiZP+tx7SHvYBHKeIYnVlYfi1S1KN7kJWQ=
In-reply-to: <062FB5377CA14EFE8C7F85A248601183@dell2400>
References: <062FB5377CA14EFE8C7F85A248601183@dell2400>


Wasn't this early distorted harmonica sound not something that was chased after (like today). but some kind of natural evolution based on cheap gear and going amplified in order to be heard, back in the day?

References:
- [Harp-L] RE: Distorted harmonica Versus Clean Harmonica
  - From: Patrick Powers

Previous by Date: [Harp-L] SUB30 Availability
Next by Date: [Harp-L] Sub 30 Suzuki
Previous by Thread: [Harp-L] RE: Distorted harmonica Versus Clean Harmonica
Next by Thread: [Harp-L] RE: Distorted harmonica Versus Clean Harmonica
Harp-L August 2012 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
Harp-L list archive Table of Contents
More information about the Harp-L mailing list

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.