Re: [Harp-L] delay signal
- To: "Robert Hale" <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gary eldridge" <eldridgegary@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] delay signal
- From: gnarlyheman@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:45:02 +0000
- Cc: Harp-l <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=x-rim-org-msg-ref-id:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:reply-to :x-priority:sensitivity:importance:to:cc:subject:from:date :content-type:mime-version; bh=BXSzY0n4RHUrSkhY6VsmdcqJxHbPtzRoHyRcoX1dA4Q=; b=hknWU56KaoLPCaKQIxGQIgDDtvw6UoxCLi0GgeEKknHtHgmUBP3jw12+HP2X3/JuW2 XjxcJEw9Pva8MuG1MwyHNnfLhCELyQf53LMO70z0IsAlASIeWG1kswEhN2dylMJqu7H2 U0vNwkfngGZHyMEEog6hCRhdAOL3EozyPdrIM=
- Importance: Normal
- Reply-to: gnarlyheman@xxxxxxxxx
- Sensitivity: Normal
One of the biggest advantages of analog vs digital is that you can change the delay time while the signal is being regenerated--
digital tends to glitch when you change the delay time.
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.