Re: [Harp-L] Question on William Clarke's Version of "Work Song"
- To: ColdRail <gwoodhouse40@xxxxxxx>, harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Question on William Clarke's Version of "Work Song"
- From: MARK BURNESS <markwjburness@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 12:57:09 +0100 (BST)
- Cc:
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1309694229; bh=1KIZftv8Mw66KltxgT8jPCqbDA5mmAJwMAIR/KdgPXg=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FEOaLBk8xqro9h7kTAy+MC7Speix/E8/wUmoH3D7B6ohdQnF6pl6hYsmzi6mH/zKuxfbO7C8H2wOVl1v1Y+wpMz+d/AuYI/fAZ16MFhk5sDbzHEuGlZc6YsZNj8HTPd6923vsHOISZyK9Zfm/UwEv2eQmV11KfDZyy+Pey5jeGo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=x8qL+6498Uqee+OV6kRYgv2gdQ+S6FbTu/M7C2pV7irgPBBd++W6u5yelHL5cFQ6xPlBGLH3ueliQuBH1KnCvPgBtRHrh9/e7qLN6q93ranVCA3fAOP8+OR1HCchdSjORScBrx0YKh6kEh1MfXhCA+LTl6+dXJodHuWRlNjafF4=;
- In-reply-to: <9ff1e75e-d1e4-4659-a6e7-a955a7d7eb53@f39g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
- References: <9ff1e75e-d1e4-4659-a6e7-a955a7d7eb53@f39g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
Clarke played this starting on 5&9 draw on a 16 hole, or 1&5 draw on a 12 hole,
not on the bottom octave of a 16 hole.
________________________________
From: ColdRail <gwoodhouse40@xxxxxxx>
To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, 3 July, 2011 0:47:53
Subject: [Harp-L] Question on William Clarke's Version of "Work Song"
On the chromatic version from the "Serious Intentions" album I
understand that Clarke played this on a 16 hole chromatic. I have
been playing this for awhile on my 12 hole CX-12. I recently received
a copy of the transcription that David Barrett did for this tune. He
has the tune playing off the low octave (i.e. the main riff being
5-1d, 5-1d, 6-2d, 7-4b, 7-3d,7-3d, 7-3b, 7-3d, 8-5b). When I play
these same holes on my 12 hole I hear the same octave range as the
Clarke recording. Am I just hearing this wrong and Clarke is favoring
the higher (right side) of the splits and I am favoring the low side
(left side) from a volume perspective so I am approximating what I am
hearing with the "Overlapping 5 hole on the 64 and the 1 hole on the
CX-12 or did he really play this starting at the 5-9d?
Thanks, Glenn
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.