[Harp-L] Re: Harp-L Digest, Vol 92, Issue 70 chromatic playing; chromatic or diatonic?
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: Harp-L Digest, Vol 92, Issue 70 chromatic playing; chromatic or diatonic?
- From: "Richard Hammersley" <rhhammersley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:54:29 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1303930476; bh=aPgNEtbyHeNye8dgNptMM9+QQ5cNexFmpIiYQbgZ//8=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:Reply-To:X-Priority:Sensitivity:Importance:Subject:To:From:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=jcv4xXG6qEXh+7dRPfJK3ALD1VieTNxiYSIeszneuQy7rm28YH4152W4ycUGYxxYxN2yQl5Di8TsIfzecAm1oikwLoo5abIiqxuTb1TqT/6q4tJaBhZWKaeWuk4P6sWbXyotHKS23J2VvuGjnTzQUs7k0jed6THRoUfXTS5DmjY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:Reply-To:X-Priority:Sensitivity:Importance:Subject:To:From:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=k9UqbriKaD5vaPzdq9XMQRJrtj+g6XyNGPoFeilD/S+glRrKXf5upv8FDh+FLUDJExhKjtcJ3fc7nVMHothgKbmKeZsHiZ72mLwn4UHeyT0Xyokj3o4Ka43h4u/7x85lguXO4ertQdm7tWFx32tv38eHxQQaNMAbVIoOsdPXBlM= ;
- Importance: Normal
- Reply-to: rhhammersley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sensitivity: Normal
How about XB-40 as a compromise? Regarding technique Monk said "Just when you think something is impossible someone comes along and does it". If I were starting now. I would focus on XB-40. I find the gentleness needed for overblows to sound right in context too inhibiting. Richard
Richard Hammersley
Grantshouse
Scottish Borders
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.