[Harp-L] Re: SS vs. brass reeds
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: SS vs. brass reeds
- From: Michael Easton <diachrome@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:16:00 -0400
- In-reply-to: <201104161303.p3GD3eqL007140@harp-l.com>
- References: <201104161303.p3GD3eqL007140@harp-l.com>
I bought 2 1847's shortly after they came out.
On average I was blowing out 1 reed every 5 gigs on the MB's or GM's
I played a lot. C, A and D.
I figured out the cost of MB's at the time and the cost of an 1847.
Since the 1847's ran close to 4 times as much as a MB they should last
at least 20 gigs based on my playing technique. To date I'm still
playing the same 2 C and A harps I bought back in 2007. Between jams,
record dates and gigs I've used the same 2 harps as my main C and A
more then 90 times. Over that time I only had to slightly retune a
few reeds.
Even though I can build them I no longer play any customs. 1847's
right out of the box are great on their own. Being a busy harp tech I
don't have time to work on my own harps and enjoy the
freedom playing Stainless Steel reeds provide.
I have friends that tend to blow them out but they play the high ends
a lot and play overblows so there is more stress on the reeds then I
play as a regular blues player.
I ordered a few Seydel SS Sessions for customers. The one guy is on
this list so he can give a review once he has a chance to give it a
test drive.
Mike
On Apr 16, 2011, at 9:03 AM, harp-l-request@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:20:21 -0700
From: Vern <jevern@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Stainless steel vs. brass/other reeds
To: "<bluesbent@xxxxxxxx>" <bluesbent@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <04A18F90-B812-4F71-863F-4D1579C4BF38@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
A test to confirm or deny the superiority of SS reeds would involve
playing a large number of harps until the reeds failed on a blowing
machine. If the manufacturer's have done that, they have not reported
it. Statistically it won't mean much, but none of the reeds on my
hard-working Saxony have failed.
The properties of SS are better than those of copper alloys in that
steel has a fatigue limit and copper alloys do not. (Fatigue limit is
the stress below which there is negligible fatigue)
There are no certainties, but I think that SS is a good bet. I think
that the average SS reed will live longer than the average copper-
alloy reed. That said, the probabilities may overlap so that the
best bronze can reed can outlast the worst SS one.
Vern
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.