Re: [Harp-L] Magnetic properties of stainless steels
- To: harp-l <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Magnetic properties of stainless steels
- From: steve warner <10reedsbent@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:42:12 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6ccxC38gM1Q6IqqYLqxtF8jtQx1rvN8nIAGTbL/eyy8=; b=xb0ixsa/Lm2tnGmjVTanfn0f9QnfrkeLxFEzEm+ZMnoDWm7aCtZwfDCtNzjXEkbsOD ojHnpIv/n7SXqLwL04eBNpKmTf6cM+R4KdfRjoGWMVN+6+VeFif9AkV5SgAV6y3tF+T+ ufRHictlfj8HwbnH3t+ssEyPlujiRwXTaqVjw=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=fB7XQsmnmVjSCbCcpIBGm6ywYyZ1HSpNH2lv4DQeS5QjJ0PigsXWoDGFMveCRPjRLF sN2ODf1pKvKcnuKUW70BtJOP3M4DWBLiB16gUMUvMTlQ4Bv41ToyVJSuuHd6XXNGo2Ag 7LwlwjBdqCImhni/rlKLQFPmMF/gltxH2BErA=
- In-reply-to: <4DA46246E26147AFB5B7DA1F1F73DCCC@fujitsu2bq5kq4>
- References: <4DA46246E26147AFB5B7DA1F1F73DCCC@fujitsu2bq5kq4>
I remember in metallurgy class 30 years ago that 400 series stainless is
magetic due to how the molecules are coagulated. In stainless the
molecules glob together in very high numbers as apposed to mild etc.. steel,
so when they do this the neg and pos get so mixed up that there is very
little pull in the magnetic process because they essentiallty cancel each
other out. In steel the molecules clump together in very limited numbers
which allows for the turning of the molecules to induce magnetism.
That's why high tensil steel usually gets a sharper edge than stainless
because big clumps of molecules break off (smaller than the eye can see)
which makes for a rough edge.
Stainless has very very high carbon, so that has nothing to do with how much
magnetism it actually has.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Aongus Mac Cana <amaccana@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> As a retired mechanical engineer, I guess I should be up to speed on the
> chemistry and metallurgy of the various stainless steels, but I am not.
> I am glad to say that (as usual) some of the cognoscenti on this list have
> already been able to fill in some of the gaps in my education.
> I remember the time - about fifty years ago - when stainless steel kitchen
> sinks were the latest "must have" It was quickly discovered that there was
> "stainless steel and stainless steel". Some of the allegedly stainless
> sinks
> could develop rust marks. In those days the test recommended for would be
> purchasers was to apply a magnet to the sink. If the magnet stuck to the
> steel it was thumbs down.
> I never thought of applying this test to the reeds of my Seydel 1847. I
> might get around to it if I ever have occasion to take the cover plates
> off.
> Beannachtaí
> Aongus Mac Cana
>
--
steve
www.myspace.com/thunderharpmics
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.