[Harp-L] re: The principles of backing
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] re: The principles of backing
- From: martin oldsberg <martinoldsberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 10:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1287939998; bh=8DKJNNE1JJE3g+y6wdrT0zy+9YTT+eUNidC1/XuYRFE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eg+9QPUxbA9y7OuW4DUiI6akvTiNm3PuPtaeI7ECioWcFBH/teHAznyYHiWBuctG+4J2j3DgMdU/TZOXsvseblc6whkD3MYrcB4WA+b0UJiAoenG74BLSt24Dis9PMx2wqAA1+9A4chD2psKExZOKyV/ibBrHrK6pGqVQFvalQU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3gGxOVtLMq9rl+VGR+dtUc0e9r+5o6EcEg/xotdUvXpqOiO6BIuJJ4MJyUCOB6gFza3+Fg+z+luzjd/av1GHoNCV7s99F0+X/an0LOi27/fEWyj8oCWipnAWv7hdw+q09/2dvJ3opBwdy0Ri7O+HVuU+x2bGifCOUSFK8iote4A=;
Thanks to all who responded to my query on the "principles of backing". (The "principles"? There aren´t any).
Gary wrote approvingly of chords and thought that I use them (I believe I wrote that I use octaves and some "chorus" but maybe I missspelt), which in fact I don´t do a whole lot. A bit vary of them harmonica chords, outside of 1-2-3 draw, can´t say why, really.
But if I did use them, there´s certainly a case to be made for Oskar´s MM, or country tuning or whatever it´s called, that Gary recommended. I own a few harps of that kind -- but find I almost never use them, which is a bit puzzling (I think that I tend to get locked in 2 pos with those harps, a bit limiting. But then again, they are great for minor playing in 5th.)
Chords work sometimes -- a distinct advantage is if you play I - IV - V stuff, as Richard H said -- but they are no silver bullet. A few months ago I was watching a documentary on "Wicked game", the Chris Isaak tune (and the last decent song to grace the pop charts, some 20 years ago), and picked up a harp as I sat there. The song has the interesting harmonica advantage that every chord in it is on a standard Richter (Bm - A - E) but ... no siree!
A few riffs could be fitted in, very discreetly, but certainly no chords, no matter how inconspicous. I tried and I tried but this atmospheric and moody tune was immediately transformed to something that had run astray from a Bavarian Oktoberfest. (But prove me wrong!)
Patrick Killeen made a case for repetitive riffing and illustrated with a perfect example. Thanks for that!
I always enjoy it myself when I can find something "obligato"-like to play, but some kinds of material are tough to approach that way.
For a case of the complete opposite, check this one out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OW-lostWb4
This is Charlie Winston´s band, harmonica player is called Ben Edwards and he´s just great. But if you don´t watch out around the 1 min mark you´re gonna miss him: his interludes in the songs are often very brief. He plays mostly chromatic, as I understand it, but with a very diatonic sound.
The amount of harmonica in this tune leaves you hanging, waiting for more, a solo or whatever, but it doesn´t come, which in itself creates a certain aesthetic pleasure ... Da poetry of unfullfilled expectation.
I´ve heard them live and although he is present on more or less every song he´s on a very short leash, they are not a "harmonica band".
I´d really appreciate more input on this topic.
Cheers,
Martin
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.