[Harp-L] problem with digest
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] problem with digest
- From: Conrad Gleich <ire.radly@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:28:56 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: Doug H <dough.harpl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1290724137; bh=+0yqdxJPW6HVuftkZ2SG8RQbzqW0dFA+a30SiNr3NwY=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RF+9putiiF8FNvBG1tT3kRDOKqU0WDvkSM8OcmGCdvK8Ye4TV4hzqFwARgfT0ixHzsTndS7wdOJnD1dHYvccX+VKG81p0/bFJsLM1Gu5SKJBl6qqm6u9/V/ArrlnuzbVXQ1P096VBgkMWK68QY41U3aNLMbdAIgc8ozQwagaGpk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qqgiY0pKKAY6/nPSSzlTrF103KP0Thqmlq8EPWI6lXGfYfErKPj9xBc9fxFwPUMoMQRbuI+622rq7BVBdNsiqsg/K5LY4Fg4sWvGPJk8Sof19xYTFp1c8CMGlJB7O7iQ2Ap3OuC+Ow5d2lw5DgjQ1P4ClsxiUWP30yfjiI+TQyo=;
Hi Doug,
Thanks for responding.
That's very interesting. Yes, my digest looks very different.
For example there are lots of " <BR> " & "<BR>>" & " " & "wd85vNPkqR8"
interspersed throughout the individual messages. Paragraphs are gone. Email
addresses are repeated multiple times with strange variations. and other weird
things.
Happy Thanksgiving !
Conrad
________________________________
From: Doug H <dough.harpl@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Conrad Gleich <ire.radly@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thu, November 25, 2010 7:06:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] problem with digest
Hi, (off list)
What I see looks OK (below). Is it supposed to be different?
Doug H
----- Original Message -----
>From: Conrad Gleich
>To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 12:06 AM
>Subject: [Harp-L] problem with digest
>
>is anyone else having this problem? Do i have a virus? *Only* happens with
>harp-l
>
>here is an example:
>
>Michael,
>
>I was thinking that it's because minor keys have more flats than major keys.
>
>C D E F G A B resolving to a C major chord has only the F tension note
>resolving down to the E. The B resolves "up" to C, while the A is
>pretty consonant with the C Major chord.
>
>C D Eb F G Ab Bb resolving to a C Minor chord has Ab resolving to the
>G, F resolving to the Eb, and Bb could optionally resolve down to G.
>Even when the Bb resolves up to the C, it is not as "naturally
>uplifting" as the B -> C of the major.
>
>I just feel that in minor, there are more notes that have a tendency
>to carry the "weight" of wanting to resolve downwards, giving us a
>sadder feel.
>
>Jason
>
>>> > Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:50:59 -0600
>>> > From: michaelrubinharmonica@xxxxxxxxx
>>> > To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> > Subject: [Harp-L] Why do we associate major with happy and minor with
>>> > sad? (No harp content)
>>> >
>>> > Guesses?
>>> > Michael Rubin
>>> > Michaelrubinharmonica.com
>
>http://myspace.com/jasonharmonica
>
>
>
>Thank You
>
>
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.