Re: [Harp-L] Musical Theory
- To: icemanle@xxxxxxx, Bill <bill.eborn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Musical Theory
- From: Will Greener <willgreener@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:29:56 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1268072996; bh=7dsDz682ucyuz8zb99qAQkIaRgzSsLseVdAMIfoFjj4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gSkztXFFteSiOgg2WkpOdJkbpensCEGFGtdAUic0pG3zxrwWjhlSQvA22ZGHwkBGAPmtNFs5Nf7LgGNzkq3bdCO/upMBIFtP56KMDkfzHXrr+oVGkWL7mqW7bGw6z8tHI9NzFhkHFsSPCIc+MfW4+q1kiGb9jiS2hjIz3bAfuRg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vzmH2AUhSAGiBsuvZRXgxXu/zP7KffE+Sfx9FBLbU3PPdAc+tXnvjrxMCMt8FpHGA/zYYalvk+sXzHIVMEvfDWhdbnz1uis3NJXd51TTw9fIjQ8a67DGjcgFdRkSwYgVGmrK74KDFzRZipgG/KkzJKae6UdTte5Of+6QXIX+IPw=;
- In-reply-to: <6d932dc1003081002v211e5bc6xa8cbcf41d0d6689b@mail.gmail.com>
I wonder...
Would it've been a happier ending if B had come in, used that leading tone of his to get G to be a bit more dominant? This might well have struck a chord with D and thus resolved whole fifth situation...
And...
I can't help but think that would have been just the tonic poor old C was looking for...
xxx
--- On Mon, 8/3/10, Bill <bill.eborn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Bill <bill.eborn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Musical Theory
To: icemanle@xxxxxxx
Cc: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, 8 March, 2010, 18:02
Brilliant!
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:02 PM, <icemanle@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> ......When you totally get this one, you will have a good basis in musical
> theory.....
>
>
>
> C, E flat and G walk into a bar and the bartender says: "Sorry we don't
> serve minors", so E-flat leaves, and C and G have an open fifth between
> them. After a few drinks, the fifth is diminished and G is out flat. F comes
> in and tries to augment the situation, but is not sharp enough.
>
> D comes in and heads for the bathroom saying, "Excuse me. I'll just be a
> second." Then A comes in, but the bartender is not convinced that this
> relative of C is not a minor. Then the bartender notices B-flat hiding at
> the end of the bar and says, "Get out! You're the seventh minor I've found
> in this bar tonight."
>
> E-Flat comes back the next night in a three-piece suit with nicely shined
> shoes. The bartender says, "you're looking sharp tonight. Come on in, this
> could be a major development." Sure enough, E-flat soon takes off his suit
> and everything else, and is au natural.
>
> Eventually C sobers up and realizes in horror that he's under a rest. C is
> brought to trial, found guilty of contributing to the diminution of a minor,
> and is sentenced to 10 years of D.S. without Coda at an upscale correctional
> facility.
>
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.