Re: [Harp-L] What's so bad about micing to a PA?

[Wolf Kristiansen <wolfkristiansen@xxxxxxxx>]

Hello Sam Blancato. This doesn't answer your question directly, but here's something to think about--

I'm from a certain generation that remembers this:  P.A.s were for vocals; the instruments were amplified through stand alone amps, one for each instrument.  I first got acquainted with the novel idea that everything comes through towers of speakers, one on each side of the stage, when I started going to rock concerts.

Here's the advantage of individual instrument amps being the main sound source for those instruments:  Each musician's sound is coming from a different location on the stage.  I like that.  It's sort of like being at an all acoustic, unamplified concert-- the guitar comes from one side of the stage, the stand up bass from the other, maybe a harmonica from left center, the singer in the middle, etc. 

What do I like about it?  It's hard to say exactly, but when it's done right, there's both a blending and differentiation of the instrument sounds.  The resultant overall sound is richer and more sonically complex than the mush that comes out of P.A. speakers, where every single performance sound originates from the same speaker(s).

So up to a point, volume wise, I much prefer amplified performances to come out of on stage instrument amplifiers, not a P.A.  

This is a repeat of an earlier post from me on this topic; don't jump on me, harp-l members, for posting it again. It says what I still think about this topic.

Cheers,

wolf kristiansen


      __________________________________________________________________
The new Internet Explorer® 8 - Faster, safer, easier.  Optimized for Yahoo!  Get it Now for Free! at http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/