Re: [Harp-L] Re: First serious foray into tuning questions
- To: "j.gordon" <jgordon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Re: First serious foray into tuning questions
- From: Tom Albanese <reedwrecker@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:44:08 -0600
- Cc: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=bwAiXmNEba4WWe7cklwM56CF2YqmQZ0kYNzpkLMNVt0=; b=j+x7y7NmNI64/+hZpLdVGhzaVddVO7LzJ7wIBt139e5ZuKAMSRVnJ++7zkxjRyOkq/ 4sUm/clLD4CVYYDZm6sC6l/0jIs4WdXLkfFJZwqQ2lgFgjqSNo5kZkkXV0WXk6B+Vx+L rkCTUHN1zyjf6yf5uDQtBlM2A6XLrtuNXGj0w=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=PTb8PI7MX1QIGDR3ztGRtV8QKy8VFxQoIoTFkeffixcl+95GzFT0feIcFN2ZNq+8Xu Yh33Nn8w9Ge7Hmn8OddFgEetl8oyypyWk0RQzZhSEa2NB8+3h+W+u+H5KVBUmYdb7zBT 12HPRkihZhn8hScEAGkrfVEP6kYEgfEgbWbug=
- In-reply-to: <1151388.1267121458505.JavaMail.root@elwamui-royal.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
- References: <1151388.1267121458505.JavaMail.root@elwamui-royal.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
I just want to say that I think it's awesome that Jimmy Gordon would
personally respond to this query, and in such an informative way. I myself
found this info on tuning octaves extremely useful. Thanks, Jimmy!
All the best to you my friend!
tom albanese
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:10 PM, j.gordon <jgordon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> To avoid breaking reeds this way try not to push the blow reed too far as
> only the tip needs to be exposed. To downtune use the scraper on the inside.
> When tuning octaves it is the lower pitched reed that should be slightly
> sharper than the higher reed, not the other way around as you say. The 3 a
> touch higher, the 9 not so much if at all. This is the way to get octaves in
> tune, and each harp, key and playing style would require a unique offset-
> there isn't an exact formula that will work universally. 0.7 cent would be
> inmperceptable, but 7 cents would be audible.
> The trick is to play the note at it's highest pitch and not let the reed
> load up.
> There are many considerations but for the octaves it is the lower reed that
> is more likely to have the pitch depressed when playing octaves.
> All the best,
> Jimmy
> http://customharmonicas.com
>
>
>
> Michael Rubin asks:
>
> So I have been studying Sleigh's manual. I have got an old harp and
> have broken 3 blow reeds by using the paper clip tool and blow reed
> support tool. How do you do that better.
>
> As per Richard's instruction, I am tuning the higher note of an octave
> combination a hair sharper than the lower octave note. For example, I
> will tune hole 5 blow 0.7 cents sharper than hole 2 blow. That sounds
> good, but when I tune hole 8 blow another 0.7 cents sharper, I get the
> octave beating.
>
> Is there a way to listen to the beating to access which note is too
> high or low? Since 2 and 5 blow sound nice, my instinct is to retune
> hole 8, but I want to follow octave beating rules. Then, is there a
> way to listen to the beating and access whether or not the note needs
> to be flattened or sharpened?
> Thanks,
> Michael Rubin
> Michaelrubinharmonica.com
>
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.