Re: [Harp-L] old Meisterclassse reeplate thickness -
- To: "Winslow Yerxa" <winslowyerxa@xxxxxxxxx>, "Harp L" <Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] old Meisterclassse reeplate thickness -
- From: "Bill" <bill.eborn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 21:56:38 -0000
- Cc:
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer :x-mimeole; bh=6IgJeRTd0ekrXW31FkR0H6zEfWArEu5vQSD7xlVpf30=; b=Zbo7e8XXHW+HxLn+Gzb4FmgkOMD5CbjOXUPkfid2gZBKA4dL99ZNmerXKilW1aFpYP o0Doq9O91E0yATDblDwmllnJq6wty3lxobPn9CTDtBYm4Wc9JnRGJHkBkUlZrnuciVWm 1V1VOvjYCrWisdZlTIsJgpG5nBz6zqtk4b1OY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority :x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=TrRSVDhYw6cvGMjBpn48fnzjhW3FPJIfDKoB5/GdLUy7V/Dn9EvZr7Y7tLsmS10arp O/IlyvMCwGeJHCaOWe24x9mRsapc5O2HrAIqBg3s2LnhpYHu3KQkTSZIzpQgNZW3XYT8 f2zNVysXgA2bZ3IYSoVtt81a7yXjLGMNyBuGM=
- In-reply-to: <656586.78504.qm@web50808.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
- References: <656586.78504.qm@web50808.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Thanks again Winslow
I'm not going to say why i asked for this information, because everyone will
want one
Can I ask again though, why for those of us who like the Hohner classic
reeds but would like them in conjunction with a slightly thicker reedplate
because we like the sound quality that could give us - can't we have this or
something like this?
How would others compare the sound quality of the old Meisterclasse to other
harps with reeds from the classic series? MBs, SP20s, GMs etc
Bill
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.