Message: 8
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:14:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Jim Rossen <jimjimdr@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Harp-L] Re: The Mission Chicago 32-20 harp amp
To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID:
<a04e49e3-7aef-47eb-806a-a1ff1e46e260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Rick- I think the discussion has been- sonic difference between a
tube rectifier and the Weber Copper Cap rectifier intended to emulate
that particular tube rectifier. I was hoping for a demonstration of
the sonic difference you noted between these devices. This is a
separate question from a comparison between a tube rectifier and a
solid state rectifier that has no emulation of tube characteristics-
I agree this difference is easily heard.
Jim
On Dec 11, 3:43 pm, Rick Davis <bluesharpa...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jim, are you suggesting there are NO sonic differences between a
solid state
rectifier and a tube rectifier? If so, that is rather astounding.
The differeces are well-known. As Gary Onofrio said, the copper
plug-in
solid state rectifier makes an amp seem slightly louder and more
crisp, and
that is exactly what I hear with these rectos. The problem is,
crisp is the
opposite of sag, and the tone we were looking for in the Mission
Chicago
32-20 amp was an authentic vintage warmth.
We nailed it. The amp sounds great. I invite you to listen to the
sound
samples at the Mission Harp Amp website: www.missionharpamps.com.
--
-Rick Davis
The Blues Harp Amps Bloghttp://www.bluesharpamps.blogspot.com/