Re: [Harp-L] Parker's Mood
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Parker's Mood
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:11:06 -0400 (EDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=fpL/6XZoJ/2FbhjYZ94Gs8w5+aqzCg264oOYIDSolyMzkDnAZQlRHq3BKc+SlQ+o; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
michael rubin wrote:
<I am not sure if I agree with Roger's comment. I also recommend
<moving the harp not the head, but clearly David is playing beautifully
<and in a very advanced style while using his head. Perhaps David has
<discovered that the head is an alternate method.
I used to be very hardline on this issue: good technique is moving the harp, bad technique is moving the head. However, I have since seen Howard Levy play on several occasions. You can't argue with the speed and accuracy of Howard's playing, and he moves his head plenty.
I continue to believe that it's better to move the harp than the head, "better" in this case meaning that it's less tiring and produces a more consistent embouchure. But if a player is getting great results by moving their head, let 'em move it.
Regards, Richard Hunter
author, "Jazz Harp"
latest mp3s and harmonica blog at http://myspace.com/richardhunterharp
more mp3s at http://taxi.com/rhunter
Vids at http://www.youtube.com/user/lightninrick
Twitter: lightninrick
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.