[Harp-L] Re: Ninth?
- To: "John F. Potts" <hvyj@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: Ninth?
- From: michael rubin <michaelrubinharmonica@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:28:59 -0500
- Cc: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sFOjk+7/JOQaeF+RhE5HVqNWXikl1aUl/V5+0XaG+7w=; b=bP60d9f3h7afqfLucUjbnRRXKz0JRuN4qdHB+1RAuEpEQ/x3WicjwR1BFsh5kD3ZM2 e8ot2zc3qbP47fiJU8tBv5XoS07T/zcqyVWRB4kaUTvoc/Qeh/mogP2h5eWALZ6emZug uQgl0x9kt3bbmylqG4k2wfArgy4UwGfy2jH+M=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KvzUcgs9a7HTmP4EINv5zGVPBCMKNAH2exyFW7d3vKHmS8c9yEnb5YzSTUi39mLdZZ HcQ4X1JsEhht72ClNOO9gA9lPHl76ri3YmbKZzVy8Zf9ZcoK9xzphX7/SjlE6VaVTWnF Uvfc5hvn3RIwa+ljkhEh6mmgLq3pBfpWho5kY=
- In-reply-to: <100CAC3D-6576-47AE-9F5F-C451D137BDD9@bex.net>
- References: <100CAC3D-6576-47AE-9F5F-C451D137BDD9@bex.net>
I cannot rock out in 5th as hard as I can in third. I play fluently
in 3rd, 4th and 5th, I overblow fine to get whatever scale I want, but
third is the rocker for me. ALthough, I do have one tune on the Kalu
James Dim the LIghts album, called Blanket where I rock out pretty
well in 4th position harmonic minor. It can probably be heard at
Kalujames.com or download on itunes.
Michael
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:32 PM, John F. Potts <hvyj@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Per Larry Marks:
>
> Why one would focus on the difficult 3rd position instead of the much easier
> and more useful 4th (relative minor).
>
> Per Michael Rubin:
>
> I see 3rd as much easier and more useful than 4th. We are all
> different in how we learn. To me, 3rd is like put a guitar capo up
> the harmonica neck two holes up from cross harp. It also has more
> rock out potential than 4th, imo.
>
> Maestros:
>
> Why play 4th or 3d when you can play 5th? 5th has all the considerable
> advantages of 4th (except for the lack of a major second in 5th) and all
> the rock out potential of 3d and is EASIER and more useful than 3d because
> there are not as many bends and there is no major sixth to worry about.
> It's like playing 2d except it's easier than 2d (not as many bends). You
> just use blow 2 for root instead of blow 3.
>
> Okay, if i need a major second, i'll use 4th and if I'm playing dorian
> minor, I'll use 3d. Otherwise, 5th is my first choice for minor key playing
> by a wide margin. Very easy, very bluesy, very flexible and, IMHO, very
> underused. Despite the conventional wisdom, I find 3d more problematic than
> useful for most minor key playing (unless the material is dorian minor).
> For natural minor, I'll use 4th before i'll use 3d, but I'll always use 5th
> as my first choice (unless the melody includes a major two, in which case
> I'll use 4th). For me, 3d is usually a distant third choice. But, YMMV.
>
> JP
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.