Re: [Harp-L] Ninth?

To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Ninth?
From: Larry Marks <larry.marks@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:36:31 -0700
In-reply-to: <s2x7a6803881004051252w33782ed1u9511dc67f421948@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20100403104000.056c66b0@pop-server.roadrunner.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20100405105540.0575b988@pop-server.roadrunner.com> <s2x7a6803881004051252w33782ed1u9511dc67f421948@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

michael rubin wrote:

...Focus on 1st, 2nd and 3rd position and get strong musically.

Why one would focus on the difficult 3rd position instead of the much easier and more useful 4th (relative minor).

-LM

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Harp-L] Ninth?
  - From: michael rubin
- RE: [Harp-L] Ninth?
  - From: Bradford Trainham

References:
- [Harp-L] Ninth?
  - From: Ken Deifik
- Re: [Harp-L] Ninth?
  - From: michael rubin

Previous by Date: [Harp-L] Toots Thielemans Live Blues
Next by Date: Re: [Harp-L] Ninth?
Previous by Thread: Re: [Harp-L] Ninth?
Next by Thread: Re: [Harp-L] Ninth?
Harp-L April 2010 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
Harp-L list archive Table of Contents
More information about the Harp-L mailing list

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.