[Harp-L] Re: Why Richter
- To: Harp-L <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: Why Richter
- From: Steve Baker <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:46:33 +0100
- Qmailshell-remotehost:
- Qmailshell-remoteip: 84.130.86.6
In my opinion Richter's idea was a stroke of genius and no other
harmonica tuning comes close in terms of simplicity and elegance. Of
course it has a great history and we're all familiar with the tonal
layout, but the standard Richter tuning can be used for so many
different styles of music and is simply the most flexible note
arrangement which the 10-hole can accomodate. The chords and tongue-
blocked intervals make it much more fun for me than for example
circular or diminished tuning. The way the overblows provide all the
missing notes is nothing short of fabulous.
I see all the other tunings I use myself as simply variations on
Richter. I don't have a problem using overblows, but sometimes things
work better with an altered tuning than with OBs. All the same,
Richter is the mother lode for me,
Steve Baker
www.stevebaker.de
www.bluesculture.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.