RE: [Harp-L] Splitter cable question

["Bill Hines" <billhines4@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm also one of Richard's patch customers and he just keeps cranking out
refinements and improvements. I was just loading the new ones last night
into the RP250. I'm also interested in the RP50 due to it's battery
operation. No pedal but I can control volume with my mic VC. 

So keep me in the loop Tony if you decide to use the patches on the
RP50, not sure if it has the USB connection to export. I'm assuming that
the patches that only use the pedal for volume would still apply, unless
some of the effects aren't on the RP50.

Bill Hines

-----Original Message-----
From: harp-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:harp-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Tony Eyers
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 6:21 PM
To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Harp-L] Splitter cable question


I think that, for live use, if it sounds fine then it is fine. The fewer

things to power the better.

As a (satisfied) customer of your patches, I'm interested in this, as no

doubt others are. Were you running the same patch in each of the RP
boxes?

I have an RP100 and an RP50. The patches sound fine in the RP100, I've 
yet to try them with the RP50. Do you know if the RP50 internals are the

same as the RP100/200 The 9V DC operation of the RP50 is attractive.

Tony Eyers
Australia
www.HarmonicaAcademy.com
...everyone plays _______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l