[Harp-L] Element poll



Hey, Mike - that's an interesting question. My personal opinion is that hotter elements usually sound better. Especially for harp players, driving the input stage of the amp hard with the mic is more important than ensuring the output stage is driven hard. We have to drive the input stage hard to get the distortion that produces bass harmonics and fattens up our tone. That distortion then proceeds through the output stage, helping to drive it hard in any case. Whatever makes an element weaker seems to also reduce its frequency response and that isn't good. Just like Sonny Jr said - if you want to drive the amp a little harder, you can back a hot element off a little with a volume control at the mic, rather than play the weaker element.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it.....


/Greg


http://www.blowsmeaway.com
http://www.bluestateband.net



From: "mike wesolowski" <mwesolowski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: March 13, 2009 7:24:33 AM PDT
To: <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Harp-L] Element poll


I'd like to get some opinions on how hot you guys think mic elements should be. I've owned a lot of mics through the years with varied degrees of "hotness". My personal opinion is that I like my elements to be kind of medium strength. My reasoning behind this is that if you've got a good strong amp, don't you want to push the amp harder to get your tone?
Seems like if you have a REAL hot mic, you can't really turn up the amp to get maximum tube saturation. Now..........if you've got a low powered amp then a REAL HOT mic would be the ticket. I know a lot of folks claim that the elements that they sell are the hottest around and then when you plug em up and play, you can hardly turn your amp up to 2.
Not looking to open a can of worms here. Just want to get some opinions.
Thanks,
Mike "Wezo" Wesolowski
www.bluesworldorder.com
www.myspace.com/harpwezo
www.megatoneamps.com






This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.