[Harp-L] Element poll
Hey, Mike - that's an interesting question. My personal opinion is
that hotter elements usually sound better. Especially for harp
players, driving the input stage of the amp hard with the mic is more
important than ensuring the output stage is driven hard. We have to
drive the input stage hard to get the distortion that produces bass
harmonics and fattens up our tone. That distortion then proceeds
through the output stage, helping to drive it hard in any case.
Whatever makes an element weaker seems to also reduce its frequency
response and that isn't good. Just like Sonny Jr said - if you want to
drive the amp a little harder, you can back a hot element off a little
with a volume control at the mic, rather than play the weaker element.
That's my story and I'm sticking to it.....
/Greg
http://www.blowsmeaway.com
http://www.bluestateband.net
From: "mike wesolowski" <mwesolowski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: March 13, 2009 7:24:33 AM PDT
To: <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Harp-L] Element poll
I'd like to get some opinions on how hot you guys think mic elements
should be. I've owned a lot of mics through the years with varied
degrees of "hotness". My personal opinion is that I like my elements
to be kind of medium strength. My reasoning behind this is that if
you've got a good strong amp, don't you want to push the amp harder to
get your tone?
Seems like if you have a REAL hot mic, you can't really turn up the
amp to get maximum tube saturation. Now..........if you've got a low
powered amp then a REAL HOT mic would be the ticket. I know a lot of
folks claim that the elements that they sell are the hottest around
and then when you plug em up and play, you can hardly turn your amp up
to 2.
Not looking to open a can of worms here. Just want to get some opinions.
Thanks,
Mike "Wezo" Wesolowski
www.bluesworldorder.com
www.myspace.com/harpwezo
www.megatoneamps.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.