Re: [Harp-L] endorsements

[Tom Albanese <reedwrecker@xxxxxxxxx>]

I agreee, let's not leave it at that. Not only are the differences between
all boutique harp amps worthy of discussion, but there are major differences
in settings and tonal options that you can get from a Meteor using only one
player and one mic. Depending on which channel you use and where you have
your tone, meat and presence controls dialed, you can vary tonal colorings a
lot on this amp. I've had mine for four years and gig with it almost
exclusively and the amp is still revealing itself to me. And of course being
heard is never a problem, loud, soft or in between (please no lectures about
loud music). Will this be the last amp I ever own? I don't know for sure but
I have one now and I love it. Thanks again Scooter!

t.a.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Anthony Smith <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> RH wrote, "Can we agree at this point that we are damn lucky to have some
> very fine amp makers working on behalf of harp players everywhere, and leave
> it at that?"
>
> Agree, yes!  Leave it at that, No!  Why not discuss the inherent
> differences between the choices so others can benefit from same?  I don't
> think it needs to get ugly but there are differences between all of them.
>  You'd be lying or uneducated if you said otherwise. That's what makes it a
> tough choice and an individual choice, their different...and that's a good
> thing!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: harp-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:harp-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Richard Hunter
> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 11:27 AM
> To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Harp-L] endorsements
>
> "Anthony Smith" wrote:
> <...The meteor has a great
> <Chicago distorted sound but the tone is consistent no matter what he does
> <with it.  That might be what YOU want but not what I want.
>
>