Re: [Harp-L] Reed Profile - More Questions
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Coble" <robertpcoble@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Harp-L" <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:43 AM
Subject: [Harp-L] Reed Profile - More Questions
(1) Are specific reed profiles (mensurs?) milled in one
pass? (It would appear so from The Harp Handbook.) I
assume that means one specific reed type (with specific
mensurs) is lathed into one strip of brass at one time
You can see a reed lathe in operation in the video tour of
the Tombo factory.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n548kAiq-zA
The lathe is seen at about 33s.
It appears that the lathe has cutters, each of which has the
profile of one reed. Each reed profile is cut into one
entire strip of material. The length of the strip is about
the circumference of the lathe mandrel.
and then the individual reeds are stamped from that strip
of brass.
A few seconds later, the same video shows machines stamping
reeds out of the machined strips.
Dang! That seems like a lot of changes to lathe settings
to produce a complete set of reeds! OR an enormous number
(1500?!?) of lathes would have to exist in the factory.
It seems that there are an enormous number of profiled
cutting tools and a way of quickly changing them in a small
number of lathes.
I guess when you're creating gazillions at a time, it
doesn't seem like that much work.
If you are in mass production of harmonicas, you need a way
such as this of making a large number of reeds having the
same profile.
I'd certainly opt for a CNC machine with a program that
could be changed on the fly.
CNC is a way of controlling an existing machine tool.
First, you need to design a machine tool that will do the
job you want done...then make jobs repeatable and faster
with CNC control. Let us assume that the lathe that we see
in the video or picture is the best machine tool for the
job. Then we might replace the tool that cuts the entire
profile with a pointed tool that moves axially to cut the
profile. We could now replace the profiled cutters with CNC
part programs for each reed. Since the pointed cutter isn't
removing as much material, we might be able to run the lathe
faster.
The traditional lathe is "Detroit automation" where the
details of the product come from the mechanical design of
the machine...in this case the profiled cutters. CNC is
more versatile because the details of the product come from
numbers stored in a computer.
(2) Are the weights (blobs) on the end of the lower pitched
reeds milled as part of the mensurs milling process?
Yes. In most cases they are the thickness of the strip
stock and are not milled at all.
(3) Regardless of the process, is specific response (the
flexibility of the reed, for lack of a better terminology)
the reason for using a weight at the free end of the
lower-pitched reed, rather than a more gradual taper
(possibly requiring a much thinner reed)?
You can lower the pitch of a reed three ways:
1. Making it thinner/weaker where it bends near the rivet.
This is the way we tune to a lower pitch.
2. Making it longer. There are limits imposed by the
dimensions of the harp and the tendency of very long reeds
to vibrate in a twisting mode.
3. Making it heavier at the tip by adding material. Some
tuners add solder to the tip.
These weights are a way of lowering the pitch of the reed
without making it too long.
(4) Is manufacturing convenience the reason for milling
across the reed (laterally) instead of milling along the
length of the reed (longitudinally)?
Yes. I made a little machine to mill reeds longitudinally.
It worked on only one reed at a time and used a cutter only
1/16" in diameter. It was not suited for mass production.
However, it did produce beautifully smooth reeds!
I assume that might be one of the reasons for earlier
reed fatigue. Or, because of the fine-grained milling
process used, is that no issue at all? (Yes, I know:
EVERYTHING in industrial engineering is a tradeoff of
various factors. I much prefer reeds with average
longevity at a reasonable [to ME] price vice reeds with
optimal longevity at an exorbitant price.)
Stress concentrations arise at abrupt changes in cross
section. Common sense tells us that smooth reeds would be
better. Tests to compare them would require very large
numbers of specimens and would be expensive and time
consuming. We get by pretty well with the esisting methods.
(5) Given that the milling process is applied to the upper
side of the strip of brass, I assume that the lower side
of the brass is completely flat. Is that so?
Yes. It must rest against the lathe mandrel to resist the
cutting forces.
That would answer my earlier question about various
substitutes (like razor blades) as reeds.
Razor blade steel is very hard. It can be sheared for
outline. However, to change its flat profile to make it
into a reed (or later to tune it) requires grinding. Steel
has a lower density and a higher modulus of elasticity than
copper alloys such as brass and bronze. A steel reed would
be thinner where it bends and thicker at the tip. Shim
stock from an industrial hardware source (e.g. McMaster
Carr) is a much better source of material for the DIY
reed-maker.
Thank you all for participating in this discussion. Lest
anyone wonder, I am NOT a machinist nor a mechanical
engineer (that must be painfully obvious to those of you
who are experts in those fields); I am a retired software
engineer - and I intend to stay as retired as I can
afford! I'm interested in the topic of harmonica
(including reeds) design as a means to the end of making
my own harmonicas play better for me.
Making a responsive reed of predictable pitch and long life
using exotic material is an interesting but daunting task.
You not only need to be a machinist, but have machines that
can work on tiny reed-sized pieces of metal to tolerances of
.0002" (about 1/10 the diameter of a human hair). Unless
the challenge is what attracts you and not just getting the
reeds, you are better off to buy your reeds. It is like
boating..... get a power boat if you are interested in the
destination, get a sailboat only if you enjoy the process of
getting there.
I have no intention of trying to compete with any
commercial company. That said, I do wish Brad Harrison
good luck in creating his business; he's going to need it
to break into a long-established, VERY competitive and
EXTREMELY exacting environment.
We all wish Brad well. He can probably make harmonicas.
Whether or not they will be perceptibly superior to those on
the market remains to be seen. However, don't expect any
miracles.
Vern
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.