[Harp-L] RE: Harp-L Digest, Vol 70, Issue 9
- To: <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Harp-L] RE: Harp-L Digest, Vol 70, Issue 9
- From: Jim Adams <tusker23@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:22:25 -0400
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <200906031536.n53FaZfn024506@harp-l.com>
- References: <200906031536.n53FaZfn024506@harp-l.com>
H'mmmm....
A honk/horde of harpers?
A blast of blowers?
A sea of suckers?
A team of tongue-blockers?
A team of tin sandwinistas?
A drove of diatonists?
A crowd/chorus of chromaticists?
A pride/pack of puckerists?
A drove of diaphragm-dependants?
A load of lungbusters?
An Apprentice Harpstrangler
> From: David Fertig <drfertig@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Harp-L] Gaggles of harmonica players?
> To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <350795.41754.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Hmm, David Naiditch smartly raises (and resolves?) an important issue:
>
> What's a plurality of harmonica players? David's "gaggle" may be it, if perhaps a bit too aptly suggesting honking geese.
>
> Is there a better plural? Herd of harmonicists? Pack of harp players? Slew of harp suckers? I suspect the fleet of febrile minds on this list-serve may have a peck of plums to offer . . .
>
> Absent a better suggestion, I vote for gaggle!
>
> Dave "Always Hedging his Bets" Fertig
_________________________________________________________________
Attention all humans. We are your photos. Free us.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9666046
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.