R: [Harp-L] 545 vs. sm57 comparison?????
I've used both of them. Now 545 is my choice. There are not BIG differences,
but you can hear them playing with those two mics. In my opinion 545 is a
little bit more reactive and louder than the 57. You get a very good sound
in almost every amplifier you connect it to. You have a great mic in your
hand. I've played with that mic thru a Peavey Classic 30, Peavey Delta
Blues, Bassman, Evil Twin...the standard of my sound with the 545 was high
everytime. With the 57 you don't have all the loud and the reaction and the
definition that you can get with the 545, but is cheap and good enough. But
if you can choose...buy the 545. That's what I think, honestly.
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: harp-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:harp-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] Per conto
di paul hoffman
Inviato: Saturday, January 31, 2009 2:51 AM
A: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Oggetto: [Harp-L] 545 vs. sm57 comparison?????
I would like to know what people feel are the differances between the 545
and the 57.
thank's
paul h.
_________________________________________________________________
HotmailR goes where you go. On a PC, on the Web, on your phone.
http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/learnmore/versatility.aspx#mobile?ocid=TX
T_TAGHM_WL_HM_versatility_121208
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.