Re: [Harp-L] Re: Embossing v Burnishing




On Jan 2, 2009, at 5:20 PM, HTownFess wrote:


Well, I call it an overbend if it's not specifically an overblow, but
never mind me, that one did not really catch on :-).  Joe is right to
point out that swaging is a catch-all term for a lot of cold metal
working, but it seems to be used mainly with tubing, rods, and
interference fits.  Anyone who's done much embossing of reedslots will
tell you that interference fits are not fun there.  I think "staking"
was proposed back in 2000, since staking tools can be useful for
embossing, but again, you are not fixing something permanently in
place, you are raising a new edge that is meant not to touch the
reed.  Joe, when you emboss a reedslot, the reedplate does wind up
thinner

Sure, it's a wee bit thinner RIGHT in the area you are pressing on.


. . . on the "upper" side of the boss, the side closest to the
reed.  The boss is formed by pushing from one side, true, but much
seems permitted in embossing, anything that forms the element that's
in relief.  Relative to the sides of the reedslot, material is pushed
*out* into the slot, and that's the raised boss, and it doesn't have
to be vertical like mountains: up's a tricky word here.

Ooookay, I follow you here. When you speak of 'raising' metal, you are speaking in reference to the slot in CROSS section. Ok, I'm with ya. I was viewing the reed plate looking DOWN.


A boss is raised on each wall of the reedslot, and that's what cuts down the
clearance. Because it's a pointy, sharp boss, it affects the tone in
ways that have been remarked onlist.

I understand. And yes, I will go along with that.

Joe says, <<Soo, when a person draws a sharp object along the sides of an opening making a furrow or cut, it would seem that they are embossing. In actuality, they are swaging. >>

No, I called that swaging, not embossing, check my third paragraph.

I know YOU called it swaging. That's why I used "It would seem", because to some people it may very well 'seem'. Hence, different approaches to the same solution. :)

Seems to me that ca. 2000, somebody prominent just gave up and started calling it "sizing" the reedslot: fitting it to the clearance you want by whatever means you care to employ.

That was the famous Dr. Antaki (from Mt Royal Blvd..up the hill from where I was born). Actually, I think he used a different word.


  There's always that option.  To
me, embossing means the common method of pressing a rounded tool into
the square-edged slot and running it along to raise bosses along each
side of the slot to reduce reed clearance.

Okey, in YOUR case, since you are talking 'in profile' or 'in cross- section', I can hardly dispute that. This is why most machined pieces are given from several views. In my particular case, I was imagining myself at my desk, looking down on the reed plate, centering my magnifying Dazor lamp on the part, and pressing down on the part.

I see the point about swaging, especially when it's swaging to create the kerf on a saw blade, but even then they seem to be using a mandrel and a die that's rotated. I just don't think it's as specific or as clear as embossing is for what people commonly do . . . plus I helped shove embossing into circulation a few years ago and it's gained traction since, as noted below.

Cool by me :)

I've certainly learned a bit this time--good measure of what's become available online since the turn of the century terminology tussle.

Oh Steve. I don't see anything on the list as a tussle. We're all after the same thing....keeping on harpin on.


Smo-joe

Stephen Schneider


On Jan 2, 2:17 pm, "jcolbysp...@xxxxxxxx" <jcolbysp...@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I vote we call it embossing because most people know what that means. It may not be an accurate term, but we know what it means. Just like the term "overblow".

____________________________________________________________
Best Weight Loss Program - Click Here!http:// thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/PnY6rbuBjbIDLn13ApPCcTnJL...


_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH,http://www.spah.org
Har...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l

_______________________________________________ Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l




This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.