[Harp-L] RE: Harp-L Digest, Vol 72, Issue 18
- To: <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Harp-L] RE: Harp-L Digest, Vol 72, Issue 18
- From: "Bill Kumpe" <bkumpe@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:08:35 -0500
- In-reply-to: <200908101923.n7AJNYfm014763@harp-l.com>
- References: <200908101923.n7AJNYfm014763@harp-l.com>
- Thread-index: AcoZ+QZ+tIpZJbkDRM6KCf6665jRogABLTaQ
Smo Joe said:
"... they should be concentrating on UNIFORMITY. Instead of 76 harps being
good in a batch of 100, it should be 96+. They need to get off their hinies
and get REAL people to test these things and anything that doesn't make the
grade goes in the 'seconds' bin. I have never seen harps sold as 'seconds'.
Why IS that? They need to cut the hell down on the number of models and make
a FEW models..very very well."
I agree wholeheartedly.
Bill Kumpe
Tulsa, OK
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.