[Harp-L] A Correction And/Or A Post-Script to the "Which Hole Number" Discussion
- To: <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Harp-L] A Correction And/Or A Post-Script to the "Which Hole Number" Discussion
- From: "Bradford Trainham" <bradford.trainham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:36:15 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Reply-To:From:To:Subject:Date:Organization:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:Thread-Index; b=u8qciO7HNiuG9aER39VWblP9Yb29agEjLP7ASlWQMH+KI2KVrc/x8W4aRmSSE4zcEU5/9P17AUW4KTFHUJJhqP2BV7w6TA12QzLCaUV1ZvATpcIkjL+jFOPOYFXZYOM7YbqDlpQX4qL6X+rUHgHqCK4B47slRRukA2ZuD8ThF+w= ;
- Organization: Home
- Reply-to: bradford.trainham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AckgSdBcNdXwyazxTk6f+ZQHrZliBQ==
Earlier, when I was holding forth on the Buddha harps, I said that I
especially liked the 1 and 2 draw bends on these harps.
Now, the 1 bend is quite nice; certainly nothing you'd want to overlook, but
I really meant holes 2 and 3, especially 3 with its possibility of three
bends.
Other than that correction, I stand by my "review", but knowing one's hole
numbers shouldn't be discounted as a means of orientation/reference on the
harp.
Otherwise, you might become... "disoriented"... Like me...
Brad (Where am I?) Trainham
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.