Re: [Harp-L] Sorry, it's combs again
The comb material matters to the player...
But IN MY OPINION the audience can't tell the difference.
It's like a pen...
A GOOD pen won't write better than a disposable one..
But the writer sure can sure tell the difference!
John Walden
London
England
In a message dated 22/09/2008 09:58:54 Pacific Daylight Time,
dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
I've blindfolded myself (closed my eyes) and blown chords into a Seydel
favorite with a wood comb, then metal. That is absolutely true about metal
combs... On aluminum combs, I get this feeling on my tongue like you get when you
stick your tongue on a 9 volt battery.
Dave
_______________________
Dave Payne Sr.
Elk RIver Harmonicas
www.elkriverharmonicas.com
----- Original Message ----
From: Steve Baker <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Harp-L <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 12:24:51 PM
Subject: [Harp-L] Sorry, it's combs again
Thanks Brendan for your thoughtful contribution to this discussion.
This still seems to me to raise the question, what exactly is it that
the player is perceiving as different? Suave Blues Man's suggestion
to test this objectively seems to me the only way to go from here.
During my comparison of around two dozen otherwise identical combs
with specific differences in material and finish, using identical
covers and the same two sets of reed plates, my notes showed
consistent differences in sound. I have no doubt that these
differences actually exist, and even though they are relatively small
and may not be noticeable to the listener, I notice them. I assume
they are the result of slightly different acoustic overtone profiles,
which will be measurable in the same way as for example the sound of
stainless steel reeds is verifiably different from the sound of brass
reeds, even though most listeners won't notice the difference. How or
whether the difference is perceived and interpreted (or not) by the
listener doesn't necessarily have any bearing on whether or not it
actually exists.
In Vol 61/83 Ken (Mojo Red) mentioned our comparison at SPAH between
his MB Deluxe fitted with the brass comb and my standard MBDL. Not
surprisingly, his one was noticeably louder than the harp with the
wooden comb, which is after all one of the reasons why people spend a
load of money on metal combs. I presume the difference is caused by
the fact that the acoustic conductivity of brass is higher than that
of wood and the inner surfaces reflect sound waves more strongly,
both of which contribute to making the instrument sound louder and
brighter.
In order to document the effect of comb material on sound it should
only be necessary to play the same sustained single notes with the
same air pressure and size of air column on all test combs (using the
same reed plates in each case) while recording the overtone profile
and the volume. The harmonica can easily be blown/drawn mechanically,
which ought to satisfy even the most hardened sceptics. I have
arranged to run tests later this year in the Hohner acoustics lab to
objectively measure any differences and will post the results here,
so maybe we can then finally lay this subject to rest,
Steve
Steve Baker
steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.stevebaker.de
www.bluesculture.com
www.youtube.com/stevebakerbluesharp
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.