[Harp-L] Sorry, it's combs again
- To: Harp-L <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Harp-L] Sorry, it's combs again
- From: Steve Baker <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:24:51 +0200
- Qmailshell-remotehost:
- Qmailshell-remoteip: 84.130.108.218
Thanks Brendan for your thoughtful contribution to this discussion.
This still seems to me to raise the question, what exactly is it that
the player is perceiving as different? Suave Blues Man's suggestion
to test this objectively seems to me the only way to go from here.
During my comparison of around two dozen otherwise identical combs
with specific differences in material and finish, using identical
covers and the same two sets of reed plates, my notes showed
consistent differences in sound. I have no doubt that these
differences actually exist, and even though they are relatively small
and may not be noticeable to the listener, I notice them. I assume
they are the result of slightly different acoustic overtone profiles,
which will be measurable in the same way as for example the sound of
stainless steel reeds is verifiably different from the sound of brass
reeds, even though most listeners won't notice the difference. How or
whether the difference is perceived and interpreted (or not) by the
listener doesn't necessarily have any bearing on whether or not it
actually exists.
In Vol 61/83 Ken (Mojo Red) mentioned our comparison at SPAH between
his MB Deluxe fitted with the brass comb and my standard MBDL. Not
surprisingly, his one was noticeably louder than the harp with the
wooden comb, which is after all one of the reasons why people spend a
load of money on metal combs. I presume the difference is caused by
the fact that the acoustic conductivity of brass is higher than that
of wood and the inner surfaces reflect sound waves more strongly,
both of which contribute to making the instrument sound louder and
brighter.
In order to document the effect of comb material on sound it should
only be necessary to play the same sustained single notes with the
same air pressure and size of air column on all test combs (using the
same reed plates in each case) while recording the overtone profile
and the volume. The harmonica can easily be blown/drawn mechanically,
which ought to satisfy even the most hardened sceptics. I have
arranged to run tests later this year in the Hohner acoustics lab to
objectively measure any differences and will post the results here,
so maybe we can then finally lay this subject to rest,
Steve
Steve Baker
steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.stevebaker.de
www.bluesculture.com
www.youtube.com/stevebakerbluesharp
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.