Re: [Harp-L] Combs!
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Combs!
- From: Winslow Yerxa <winslowyerxa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=N7bQfMUVr1VManCdw/IAmhvjPr4pNYSLO6gbTLCTmM0YiVE83xXYaJJ9LOUu64QnU8QoDyfwbl7IXf4Oh/80P9TknE2KuD6n1jqSlTQVzEqCj2O4vNmd9aex29HxMQMrcQ1qQYrz+Zvf677O0HiD/fRZOHbwWabUldayM+/Pdic=;
- In-reply-to: <011201c91a14$40537850$c801000a@user292e480637>
- Reply-to: winslowyerxa@xxxxxxxxx
Not if it doesn't produce the expected result :)
Winslow
--- On Thu, 9/18/08, Vern Smith <jevern@xxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
At the SPAH 97 comparison, the opening measures of "Summertime" were
played
on the test harps by John Walden. Later, some of the same harps were played
by a machine, a single note.
You gave the argument against the machine. Others argue that a human player
detects differences and compensates by the way he plays. A machine doesn't
do that.
Should not doing it both ways satisfy everyone?
Vern
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.