Re: [Harp-L] Brass vs Stainless Steel
- To: Harp-l <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Brass vs Stainless Steel
- From: "lil Buddha" <ltlbuddha@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 08:17:37 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=nF3OIptcsbVDQ2EE6MZTPjtxpkhwcwmyBu3V90Aq26g=; b=ZIDK45B6g++j0mvc55cS0Ei7V7xdzKSiWa/MazHro3eJ+ff4Jy6ccdBoB3A80IY+3H eAK8/tRgrzXf2+YTLZJG7ivi2rM13X7szKdVx1VSOukNC7PQS/1uMdzNAPe/KCFh0YRt ruSrUhyZb4UOA298VbixE2oFeXBRQQ/OyC4ME=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=Ku/JDXrP3rzDQzNCxITyIHeq/KVc3e8pyQz3Huk4nRzfpoveefSm58cArOq5WIHa4A va2CvgoymqCxAqx+W1vUbuwnYPqzlgXzgqXThFadjWTFS9X0Ebk8VnAxiZL+kY30K0ra hlM0k3Vm64hx5b4gcnHQ9Nf0Yb2gHjDN8DOpE=
- In-reply-to: <090520081332.9631.48C134DD000CE6EB0000259F2207000953970E0B050B020E06@comcast.net>
- References: <090520081332.9631.48C134DD000CE6EB0000259F2207000953970E0B050B020E06@comcast.net>
I am not a metallurgist, but from what I have read here is how it works;
many metals exhibit the effects of cumulative stress, but steel does not.
Meaning that brass and bronze WILL eventually fail with repeated load no
matter how small the load. Steel, theoretically at least, will never fail if
loading is kept below a particular level.
What am I missing?
Of course, the key to reed longevity whatever the material is do not use
excessive force.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.