[Harp-L] off the shelf quality
Ryan writes:
"It's just hard to believe that after 10 years and with all this
competition, a company has not come out with a harp that plays good
out of the box? Isn't that what everybodys been complaining about for
years? "
Most harmonica companies produce decent off the shelf instruments.
Most are decently in tune and while gapped fairly high, certainly
fully playable. Different companies have different quality control
methods, and different models will be aimed at different markets
(it's not reasonable to expect the same quality in a $10 harp as a
$25 harp), but for the middle-of-the-road harmonica the market is
both large and more than decent in terms of quality.
Two companies that tend to get superior ratings in terms of quality
control are Lee Oskar and Suzuki. Indeed, Lee's QC should be a model
for other companies. And both these companies produce very nice
harmonicas that should satisfy most people's needs. Suzuki has even
gone a step farther and produced some very high end models recently,
the Pure Harp, Firebreath and Fabulous (and, yes, these names do
truly suck). This is a new market for the harp, and Hohner (MB
Deluxe), Hering (Golden Blow) and Seydel (1847 line) have all brought
out higher end models as well.
It's worth remembering that the overwhelming majority of the market
is not professional players, harp-lers or the like but people who's
main concern is the most basic quality for the least amount of
money. It's easy to get the impression from reading harp-l that
everyone is either buying "custom" harps or taking their harps apart
and tweaking them on their own. Nothing could be further from the
truth.
"Who are some good but not super expensive harp builders? "
If money is your main concern, then you might as well not bother.
The best cost more for a reason, and anything less than the best
isn't worth it, IMO.
()() JR "Bulldogge" Ross
() ()
`----'
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.