Re: [Harp-L] Harmonica within a larger Musical Framework




On Oct 20, 2008, at 3:14 PM, Philharpn@xxxxxxx wrote:


I consider a variety of harps essential to the well- stocked harp box. This
includes diatonics in all keys, country tuned harps, minor keys, Melody Maker
as well chromes in 10s, 12, 16s and several keys and special tunings like C7
and G7.

I think that a full (extended to ..maybe 15) set of Richters, and about 6 country, 4 or so minors, and a chromo 48 or 56 would suffice.

For the sake of argument -- Chromatic players are more likely to read music
than diatonic. Why this is, I don't really know.

I do. Most harmonica players start out by ear. Eventually, there comes a time when they want to play something that has a couple key changes that isn't easy to do by ear, and so, will use some sort of crutch. In my case, I will jot down a difficult section. That's all I usually need. If playing in an ensemble, music is handy to keep you on time and in synch with the rest of the players. Especially if your part is a harmony part. Harmony parts are easier if written down. Not that it's can't be done by ear. There are some amazingly proficient ear harmonizers, but they are an anomoly.


With reading music comes an understanding of how mucic works.

This is not to say that if you don't read music, you don't understand music
theory. But some basic reading skills go a long way to understanding music..

Some players are what I would call a natural, and can do anything, but, again, very rare.

There are a number of possibilities:
1. Some see the chrome as more advanced because it has "all" with touch of
button.

I would have used the word appropriate. Some work is best done with a chisel, some a plane.

2. Consequently, they see it as less limiting.

A chromo IS less limiting. Diatonics (at the advanced level) are monsters to play.


3. Possible but feasible. How many times can you try to play a song on a
diatonic on to find you need several bends in a row. But trying it on chrome works
out (even Hohner Slider Harp).

Exactly. Many notes on diatonic must be 'manufactured'. Herein lies the Achille's heel. It take effort to master the tonality, timbre, pitch.


4. The range of 10 holes is too short -- you need 4 octaves to play all the
notes (even with overblows and bends).

On some tunes, you need to special tuning..no matter HOW good you are. On many tunes, you have to switch harps. Yes, it's true, some players CAN play without the special tuning, but they either work around the critical notes, leave them out entirely, or junk em up so bad, they would have been better left out. Nothing worse than leaving out those critical notes. When I hear someone do that, it just kills it....for me.

Blues


And you're right about the key of C for chromatic players -- Hohner repair
techs report the reeds needed to play in the key of C are those most often
replaced (esp. on the chord harmonica).

Yes. The premise here (correct me if I'm wrong) is that most chromo players play in C on a C chromo. Ok, I'll buy that. But just like there are neophyte, hobbyist, 'owner', players on Chromo, we have that on diatonic too. The divinig rod being that diatonic harpists can change keys by changing harps. Not everyone can sit there like Michael Rubin and stay on one harp.

The counterpoint to why all chromatic players play in the key of C is the
same reason all diatonic players always play the same stuff in second position.

Ok, another way of saying what I was trying to say...only better.

FYI: Keys of G and F would be almost as easy on chrome as they require one
button push for F# and Bb respectively.

(Personally) rather than picking G, I would sooner pick D as a second choice. Draw keys seem to sound better on a chromo. All my chromo tunes on you-tube) have been in draw keys. Most were also minor keys. Exception: After the Lovin in G nat. (which was diatonic). Fwiw (my opinion) when you're playing in minor keys, you are no longer in the 'safe' world.
smo-joe




This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.