Re: [Harp-L] EQ'ing for harp meets the materials debate
- To: "harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx" <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] EQ'ing for harp meets the materials debate
- From: "john" <jjthaden@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:01:19 -0500
- Cc: gbrooksvt <gbrooksvt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=flash.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Date:From:To:Cc:References:Subject:Message-ID:X-mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OZF3Fj2yK37mNr3xU1IKCW9/K3j84+R+ChI2FC/y7gqF6sbbNozIxqeJqQnC3mN2+msmy3xBeVYAUXYS7bZZ7j2eaeSppPDO9DsOUpHZ0QVT3nRpmu08QaoFB3Mfi4xaSsB6C01kEeRXiasEXXcsX5/mO09M/Zsj/RXz+hLgBS0= ;
- References: <0JYI00FTU7N2U8F3@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net>
Well George, Vern, I guess it's time to unpack that Styrofoam comb again.
Fooled 'em with it at SPAH a decade ago but maybe the human ear has
evolved since then.
-John Thaden
======= At 2008-03-29, 13:13:33 you wrote: =======
><<Different brands can sound quite different from
>>one another, and materials and quality of construction can
>>also affect the tone. A harmonica with a wooden comb, for
>>example, may sound warmer than one with a plastic comb....
>
>There it is, in black and white! On the Web! I always knew it was
>true.
>
>George >>>
>
>
>
>George,
>
>
>
>I hate to burst your balloon here but this really doesn't prove a thing.
>
>Just because some recording engineer says something doesn't make it true.
>
>I'm a wallpaper hanger and painter by trade and I can tell you that I've
>read
>
>Pages, and pages of advice on the internet from various sites,
>
>claiming to be authorities on wallpaper and paint wherein the absolutely
>wrong
>
>advise is given and absolutely wrong things are stated.
>
>
>
>What you need to believe is your own ears. The fact is there are a lot of
>
>things that effect tone far more than comb material. For starters there is
>the player.
>
>The player has a far greater effect on tone than the harp he or she is
>using. As
>
>Blues players go, I have pretty damn good tone. Give me a Suzuki Folkmaster
>(a very
>
>Crappy harp IMHO) and give a guy with less experience and lousy tone a
>Marine Band and
>
>I promise you in a blind comparison you'll think I'm playing the MB and the
>other guy is playing
>
>the crappy harp. But you put me next to a guy with a really huge oral
>cavity, who has the ability
>
>to produce a deep, thick tone and you'll think I'm the guy with the cheap
>harp. I've only scratched the
>
>surface here. As anybody who can think for a minute of all the factors,
>from construction of that harp, to
>
>the skill level of that player, to even the song being played, can tell you,
>comb material really
>
>doesn't make much difference - to the listener. Now how it feels to you as
>a payer is a different matter.
>
>
>
>This controversy is, was, and always will be a silly one.
>
>
>
>Sam Blancato, Pittsburgh
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.